Talk:Marco Materazzi: Difference between revisions
Campstriker (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|align="center"|[[Talk:Marco Materazzi/Archive1|1]] |
|align="center"|[[Talk:Marco Materazzi/Archive1|1]] |
||
|} |
|} |
||
==NOT Regarding Zidane's headbutt== |
|||
i do believe that Materazzi is one of the most violent palyer of the game. Remember this AC-Inter game where he elbows one guy just before kicking another in his deepest intimity. Some scenes of his career should be rated above 18. An interesting stat would be the number of red card he got ?[[User:Kekel|Kekel]] 10:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Archive == |
== Archive == |
||
Revision as of 10:25, 10 July 2006
|
|---|
| 1 |
NOT Regarding Zidane's headbutt
i do believe that Materazzi is one of the most violent palyer of the game. Remember this AC-Inter game where he elbows one guy just before kicking another in his deepest intimity. Some scenes of his career should be rated above 18. An interesting stat would be the number of red card he got ?Kekel 10:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Archive
I archived all of that idle discussion into #1, so this can be left to discussion what should/should not happen to the article, rather than whether or not he is a cheat etc. --Killfest2 06:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Regarding Zidane's headbutt
I think we should wait for an actual quote from a French player or Zidane himself before even mentioning any alleged "racism".
In this source [1] it just says "FOXSports.com's Jamie Trecker reports that French players told French media members that Materazzi used a racial slur which prompted the headbutt."... it doesn't state which players said this or even a direct quote, its pure speculation.
Lets wait it out and see what Zidane claims the reasoning was first before branding a player "racist" without any proof. - Deathrocker 07:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- This is disgraceful. Everybody knows that Zidane will probably not confirm anything regarding the incident, just as he did not regarding the Saudi player previously. Stating that as the sole criteria for including the information is absurd. THere are many other possible sources. If we get quotes of ALLEGATIONS then a statement that there were such allegations should be included, considering the importance of the match in which the incident occurred. Not only that, but all discussion of the incident has been censored from the main discussion page, labeled as "idle" and the article has been locked. But I do not see any evidence that the people who are locking the page, and deleting the discussion, are any more objective or trustworthy than anybody else. This page is clearly being run by Inter or Italian fans with no objectivity on the matter whatsoever. THere is also more than a hint of rascism in considering the entire matter idle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.101.252 (talk • contribs)
Whatever, you guys are like watching this page like big time. relax, get a life, it was just an incident. He doesn't care, he just did it and that's that. He can't go back in time and change that. It was distined to. Geez, big deal. The news will fade out in like a few days. I just don't get why you guys make a big deal. [[2]]
- Please, only talk about the article, and not about whether it was disgraceful or not. Killfest2 09:38, 10 July 2006 (UTC)