Talk:John Waters (columnist): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
FEMINAZI, CAMES IN WILIPEDIA, TOO . |
FEMINAZI, CAMES IN WILIPEDIA, TOO . |
||
FIX THIS, OK . IT WAS HIS (JOHN WATERS ) OPINION, DONT PUT YOURS . / P. QUINTELA .. --END// |
FIX THIS, OK . IT WAS HIS (JOHN WATERS ) OPINION, DONT PUT YOURS . / P. QUINTELA .. --END// |
||
:I did not dispute that he used the term "feminazi" - in fact that's why I made that comment. John Waters tends to badly overstate cases he tries to make, thus even when I agree with him I see him shooting himself in the foot. I read the debate between John Waters and Sean Love and concluded that Waters was being his usual over-the-top self. It's not like he's debating extremists like Andrea Dworkin! He once complained about feminists and the Irish Constitution when the article he cited was one that had been in the constitution since 1937 - hardly a document that was written by militant feminists! [[User:86.43.66.207|86.43.66.207]] 20:10, 10 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:10, 10 July 2006
His campaign for fathers' rights' has been marred by rhetoric such as "feminazis"[3]. THIS IS BIASED ... HE SAID IT, HE SAID IT . IT HAS NOT MARRED, AND IS NOT RHETORIC . FEMINAZI, CAMES IN DICTIONARY.COM, AND IS VERY USED IN THOSE SITUATIONS (and others, by the way), ABOUT FATHERS RIGHTS, VERSUS ULTRA FEMINISTS, ETC ETC . FEMINAZI, CAMES IN WILIPEDIA, TOO . FIX THIS, OK . IT WAS HIS (JOHN WATERS ) OPINION, DONT PUT YOURS . / P. QUINTELA .. --END//
- I did not dispute that he used the term "feminazi" - in fact that's why I made that comment. John Waters tends to badly overstate cases he tries to make, thus even when I agree with him I see him shooting himself in the foot. I read the debate between John Waters and Sean Love and concluded that Waters was being his usual over-the-top self. It's not like he's debating extremists like Andrea Dworkin! He once complained about feminists and the Irish Constitution when the article he cited was one that had been in the constitution since 1937 - hardly a document that was written by militant feminists! 86.43.66.207 20:10, 10 July 2006 (UTC)