Talk:EBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C.: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
SCOTUS tag |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WP_SCOTUS}} |
|||
==Conclusion?== |
==Conclusion?== |
||
Thanks for add a conclusion, but I question part of it: "Thus, the Roberts opinion would seem to lean more heavily in favor of granting an injunction, while the Kennedy opinion expresses more skepticism, particularly where the validity of the patent has also been challenged and remains unsettled." |
Thanks for add a conclusion, but I question part of it: "Thus, the Roberts opinion would seem to lean more heavily in favor of granting an injunction, while the Kennedy opinion expresses more skepticism, particularly where the validity of the patent has also been challenged and remains unsettled." |
Revision as of 02:42, 11 July 2006
![]() | U.S. Supreme Court cases Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Conclusion?
Thanks for add a conclusion, but I question part of it: "Thus, the Roberts opinion would seem to lean more heavily in favor of granting an injunction, while the Kennedy opinion expresses more skepticism, particularly where the validity of the patent has also been challenged and remains unsettled."
I know that eBay's challenge to the '265 patent came up in oral arguments, but that isn't the focus of Kennedy's opinion. A better summation might be: "Thus, the Roberts opinion would seem to lean more heavily in favor of granting injunctions in patent cases, while the Kennedy opinion expresses more willingness for district courts to consider the changing nature of patents."--agr 04:42, 16 May 2006 (UTC)