Jump to content

User talk:MEOGLOBAL: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
MEOGLOBAL (talk | contribs)
Undid revision 634744221 by Gezginrocker (talk)
Line 11: Line 11:


* Do not type it to me. [[User:MEOGLOBAL|MEOGLOBAL]] ([[User talk:MEOGLOBAL#top|talk]]) 21:25, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
* Do not type it to me. [[User:MEOGLOBAL|MEOGLOBAL]] ([[User talk:MEOGLOBAL#top|talk]]) 21:25, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Media of Turkey]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Gezginrocker|Gezginrocker]] ([[User talk:Gezginrocker|talk]]) 21:26, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:26, 20 November 2014

Media of Turkey

The portion you removed from this article was well supported with references. If you remove it again, I'll make an "edit war" complaint about you. If you are uncomfortable about the added section, start a discussion on the article's talk page. Gezginrocker (talk) 20:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are different references from at least different 5 media groups, including Bloomberg International. I warned you about not to edit war, but you didn't listen. Pro-AKP media is an undeniable truth of Turkey. Since you want it to be hidden, you are the one who is acting because of your political view. You may be an AKP supporter, but you can't hide the current situation of Turkish media. Gezginrocker (talk) 21:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • If I would be AKP supporter, I would remove other information who aganist to AKP. 5 years old child can think harder than that. I can clearly understand that what you support by writing this "AKP supporter" to me. I will write this article from bonnet to heels.