Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sue Rangell: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 22: Line 22:


======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======
Without an idea of who the master is this would probably count as a fishing expedition, if a master can be found it would probably go through without a problem as checkuser ready. [[User:Hell in a Bucket|Hell in a Bucket]] ([[User talk:Hell in a Bucket|talk]]) 20:41, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>



======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======

Revision as of 20:41, 30 November 2014

Sue Rangell

Sue Rangell (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
30 November 2014

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets


  • User meets the duck test as second edit was to blue link their user page
  • First 12 edits were to achieve autoconfirmed status and waited approx 9 days
  • 13th edit was to a semi-protected page
  • 13th edit was to pursue disputes with User:Lightbreather and User:Carolmooredc which the user has not encountered on this account before that point. Sue Rangell was in disputes with these two editors over gun control.
  • EChastain claims to have a doctorate in psychology, Sue Rangell claims to be a sociologist.
  • Sue Rangell stopped editing 14 August 2014. If EChatain is a clean start then it fails WP:Clean start: "It is expected that the new account will be a true "fresh start", will edit in new areas and avoid old disputes, and will follow community norms of behavior." v/r - TP 20:28, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users

Without an idea of who the master is this would probably count as a fishing expedition, if a master can be found it would probably go through without a problem as checkuser ready. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 20:41, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments