Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DPeterson: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
NJMSWPHD (talk | contribs)
Line 23: Line 23:
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>======
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small>
It seems that he sources or references added do meet policy regarding being reliable sources. In addition I tried to discuss the matte on talk page, but there was no dialogue, only reversions. [[User:NJMSWPHD|NJMSWPHD]] ([[User talk:NJMSWPHD|talk]]) 01:25, 4 December 2014 (UTC)



======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======

Revision as of 01:25, 4 December 2014

DPeterson

DPeterson (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:



03 December 2014

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets


Shameless WP:DUCK re-inserting[1] the same references to Arthur Becker-Weidman as past sockpuppets.[2]. See Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/DPeterson. KateWishing (talk) 01:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. It seems that he sources or references added do meet policy regarding being reliable sources. In addition I tried to discuss the matte on talk page, but there was no dialogue, only reversions. NJMSWPHD (talk) 01:25, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments