User talk:Brodycody13: Difference between revisions
Brodycody13 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
The articles I'm interested in are [[helper theory]], [[dominant response]], [[curse of knowledge]], and [[non-verbal leakage]] |
The articles I'm interested in are [[helper theory]], [[dominant response]], [[curse of knowledge]], and [[non-verbal leakage]] |
||
Any of those would be good. I would put non-verbal leakage as the best one since it only has sources from 1968 and there has been a good amount of research done on nonverbals over the years. Would be good to relate to poker too. Helper theory and curse of knowledge MAY be being worked on by other students, so we might need to sort that out.[[User:ScottPKingPhD|ScottPKingPhD]] ([[User talk:ScottPKingPhD|talk]]) 18:43, 3 February 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:43, 3 February 2015
Nice work!
|
The WikiCookie | |
| You've learned how to use basic wikicode in your sandbox. You can always return there to experiment more. |
Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. Brodycody13 (talk) 00:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Hey Gertrude thanks for the help :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paolasotoher12 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Mr. Wong! HayleyLundblad (talk) 21:55, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
The articles I'm interested in are helper theory, dominant response, curse of knowledge, and non-verbal leakage
Any of those would be good. I would put non-verbal leakage as the best one since it only has sources from 1968 and there has been a good amount of research done on nonverbals over the years. Would be good to relate to poker too. Helper theory and curse of knowledge MAY be being worked on by other students, so we might need to sort that out.ScottPKingPhD (talk) 18:43, 3 February 2015 (UTC)