Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:A Man Called Nereus: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
PRose88 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


That does not appear to be a reliable source. It explicitly states that it reviews non-notable movies. [[User:Deunanknute|Deunanknute]] ([[User talk:Deunanknute|talk]]) 00:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
That does not appear to be a reliable source. It explicitly states that it reviews non-notable movies. [[User:Deunanknute|Deunanknute]] ([[User talk:Deunanknute|talk]]) 00:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

http://www.comicbooked.com/victoria-paege-at-phoenix-comicon-2012/ .... http://www.futureclassx.com/bodypaint/conventions/PhoenixComiCon/120526-PHXCC-ISIS/2012PhoenixComiconFilmFestival.pdf

Revision as of 00:53, 10 February 2015

Draft:A Man Called Nereus

Draft:A Man Called Nereus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

non-notable per WP:FILM no independent mentions, possible COI by creator Deunanknute (talk) 23:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is an Independent review one of many: http://www.searchmytrash.com/cgi-bin/creditsb.pl?mancallednereus%282012%29

That does not appear to be a reliable source. It explicitly states that it reviews non-notable movies. Deunanknute (talk) 00:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.comicbooked.com/victoria-paege-at-phoenix-comicon-2012/ .... http://www.futureclassx.com/bodypaint/conventions/PhoenixComiCon/120526-PHXCC-ISIS/2012PhoenixComiconFilmFestival.pdf