Revision as of 04:52, 7 April 2015

Conflict of interest

The material is based on fact and is verifiable by the links and references in the article. Please point out how the validity of this information is influenced by conflict of interest. Pleasure point 23:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article is clearly a self-promotion written primarily by a user named Pleasure Point, and not citing any tertiary sources. "Tertiary sources, what's that?" you might ask. Exactly why this article should not be here. The subject is not allowed to write an article about itself, that's the basic conflict of interest rule. Additionally, this scarcely rises to the level of notability, except within the tiny community mentioned in the article. I think the article should be deleted as conflicted, not notable, and poorly sourced.JoGusto (talk) 04:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Conflict of interest
+=Conflict of interest=
 The material is based on fact and is verifiable by the links and references in the article.
 Please point out how the validity of this information is influenced by conflict of interest.
 [[User:Pleasure point|Pleasure point]] 23:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
+:The article is clearly a self-promotion written primarily by a user named Pleasure Point, and not citing any tertiary sources. "Tertiary sources, what's that?" you might ask. Exactly why this article should not be here. The subject is not allowed to write an article about itself, that's the basic conflict of interest rule. Additionally, this scarcely rises to the level of notability, except within the tiny community mentioned in the article. I think the article should be deleted as conflicted, not notable, and poorly sourced.[[User:JoGusto|JoGusto]] ([[User talk:JoGusto|talk]]) 04:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC)