Talk:Protractor: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:08, 9 April 2015

Possible link spam

It could just be that I can't read German, but the link to Geodreieck seems to have nothing to do with protractors. Dan Slotman 20:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Improper link

I agree that the link has nothing closely related to protractors.Versi 05:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with bevel protractor

The bevel protractor article does not contain sufficient information to stand on its own. As it is a specific kind of protractor, it should be merged into this article.

Neelix (talk) 18:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seemed to have not been controversial suggestion so I have started making the merge -Hunting dog (talk) 19:06, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

combination french curve / protractor

Please add picture of classic common clear plastic combination french curve / protractor (which was standard in US schools in the 1960s).-71.174.183.177 (talk) 02:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 [[User:Neelix|Neelix]] ([[User talk:Neelix|talk]]) 18:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 :Seemed to have not been controversial suggestion so I have started making the merge -[[User:Hunting dog|Hunting dog]] ([[User talk:Hunting dog|talk]]) 19:06, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
+== combination french curve / protractor ==
+Please add picture of classic common clear plastic combination french curve / protractor (which was standard in US schools in the 1960s).-[[Special:Contributions/71.174.183.177|71.174.183.177]] ([[User talk:71.174.183.177|talk]]) 02:08, 9 April 2015 (UTC)