User talk:Debaprasad01: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:48, 22 May 2015

Welcome!

Hello, Debaprasad01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 12:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Subimal Basak may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

] 2001. Collection of Criticisms of Bangla Short Stories. Samanta, Subal ed. Ebang Mushayera. VII: 4

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear BracketBot, Thanks a lot for rectify the syntax. Best regards, (Debaprasad01 (talk) 04:22, 7 November 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Former account?

Did you formerly edit with the account User:Supriyya?·maunus · snunɐɯ· 20:34, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No not at all! I don't know him/her. Please clarify as I don't understand what are you talking about? User:Debaprasad01

Supriyya was an editor who caused a lot of problems and was blocked for abusing multiple accounts. They spent most of their time arguing about the possibility of a post-structural linguistics, based on Foucauldian and Derridean ideas - and for including poststructuralism prominently in articles on linguistics - in spite of that movement having had very little influence on linguistics. Your recent edit to the talkpage for Noam Chomsky, which by the way is not an acceptable use of the discussion page, reminded me of that editor, whom I believe was also called Debaprasad. I hoe I am wrong and that you will provide good contributions to the encyclopedia. But remember that article talkpages are not fora for general discussion about the topic of the only for discussions of how to improve the article. And remember to use reliably published sources to support your arguments.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 21:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly note that I have only one account and I don't know Supriyya. And In the talk page, I just paste two URLs by deleting one old URL. The statement "..whom I believe was also called Debaprasad" is defamatory. I am not believing in belief without any concrete proof.

Please compare these two statements: 1. "As for noting that Supriyya's namebeing the same as yours, that can hardly be "defamatory". 2. "..whom I believe was also called Debaprasad" (I said that this statement was defamatory) And I wish to emphasize this statement, "...in spite of that movement having had very little influence on linguistics..." It's an excellent statement on the history of linguistics. I am subscribing it. User:Debaprasad01

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 . "As for noting that Supriyya's namebeing the same as yours, that can hardly be "defamatory".
 . "..whom I believe was also called Debaprasad" (I said that this statement was defamatory)
-And I wish to emphasize this statement, '''''"...in spite of that movement having had very little influence on linguistics..."''' ''Italic text'''' It's an excellent statement on the history of linguistics. I am subscribing it.
+And I wish to emphasize this statement, '''''"...in spite of that movement having had very little influence on linguistics..."'' It's an excellent statement on the history of linguistics. I am subscribing it.
 [[User:Debaprasad01]]