Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remorse 1981: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:49, 17 October 2004

Remorse 1981

See above entry on Spinsane. A Google search for this group reveals 68 hits once the mirrors are factored out--hardly a large number for a computer-oriented group. Not notable. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 21:49, Oct 17, 2004 (UTC)

Keep. A simple google search for "Remorse ASCII" yields another 368 hits. What, in your book, constitutes a "large number" and since when did Wikipedia require a large number of google hits to be a valid and worthy subject? [[User:Radman1|Radman1 (talk)]] 15:17, Oct 17, 2004 (PST)

Keep. I am horrified that the viability of articles are defined by their search hits on Google, a commercial service. At worst, this is arbitrary, at best, it's merely misguided censorous activity by a myopic tot. [[User:jscott|jscott (talk)]] 18:47, Oct 17, 2004 (EST)

Revision as of 22:23, 17 October 2004 edit R.123 (talk \| contribs) 7,935 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:49, 17 October 2004 edit undo Jscott (talk \| contribs) 255 edits →‎[[Remorse 1981]] Next edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:

	* '''Keep'''. A simple google search for "Remorse ASCII" yields another [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22Remorse+ASCII%22+-encyclopedia+-wikipedia+-dictionary 368 hits]. What, in your book, constitutes a "large number" and since when did Wikipedia require a large number of google hits to be a valid and worthy subject? [[User:Radman1\|[[User:Radman1\|Radman1]] [[User talk:Radman1\|(talk)]]]] 15:17, Oct 17, 2004 (PST)		* '''Keep'''. A simple google search for "Remorse ASCII" yields another [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22Remorse+ASCII%22+-encyclopedia+-wikipedia+-dictionary 368 hits]. What, in your book, constitutes a "large number" and since when did Wikipedia require a large number of google hits to be a valid and worthy subject? [[User:Radman1\|[[User:Radman1\|Radman1]] [[User talk:Radman1\|(talk)]]]] 15:17, Oct 17, 2004 (PST)

			* '''Keep'''. I am horrified that the viability of articles are defined by their search hits on Google, a commercial service. At worst, this is arbitrary, at best, it's merely misguided censorous activity by a myopic tot. [[User:jscott\|[[User:jscott\|jscott]] [[User talk:jscott\|(talk)]]]] 18:47, Oct 17, 2004 (EST)