Jump to content

User talk:Elee: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m quick comment cleanup
Line 27: Line 27:
: Hey there [[User:BiKaz]] - looking at the edit again I sort of like your version as well... You do what you think is best! [[User:Accents|Accents]] 11:52, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
: Hey there [[User:BiKaz]] - looking at the edit again I sort of like your version as well... You do what you think is best! [[User:Accents|Accents]] 11:52, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
:: Thank you so much for your kindness and understanding! Salam (peace). ♥ <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:BiKaz|BiKaz]] ([[User talk:BiKaz|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/BiKaz|contribs]]) 12:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:: Thank you so much for your kindness and understanding! Salam (peace). ♥ <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:BiKaz|BiKaz]] ([[User talk:BiKaz|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/BiKaz|contribs]]) 12:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Principality of Sealand ==

Hi Accents,
I do not see what is not "constructive" about a statement that is to this day debated. The UK never made an official claim on Sealand which is why the whole subject is under debate. The statement of Sealand not being grandfathered in has no citation and seem more of a bias statement as both sides have their valid arguements. From the "Creating your own country" documentary, Danny Wallace calls the British embassy to inquire whether Sealand was itself a nation or not to which they were unable to give an answer.

Revision as of 14:49, 15 June 2015

Mistake with LienVietPostBank

Hi Accents, I am Daibangftu. I am updating the information for the topic LienVietPostBank as they are updating their annual reports. I have changed a lot of information as I would like to reorganize the structure of the article. I also replaced the old information with the newly updated information so there are a number of changes.

Could you kindly keep changes with the article because I did a lot work with the article. Reverting the old information could make my contributive work wasteful.

Thank you so much!

Hi User:Daibangftu - that's absolutely reasonable. I'll filter it from Huggle for the time being, but my suggestion is that you perform these edits in a draft, as it looks like the entire article could use a rework. Accents 10:43, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi User:Accents - Thank you! I shall do edits in a word file then copy and paste all the data on the content. I do hope that my work will be ok with Huggle. Thank you!


Marina and the diamonds

Hey, I'm just adding some details from the sources to make the article more accurate. EllenPao (talk) 10:54, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, nice username :^) Fired yet from Reddit? So, based on the edits you've made so far, what you could really do to make your edits shine are to provide factual sources - e.g. how do you know she dropped out instead of quitting? Where does it say her manager worked with her for 9 months? Hope this helps! Accents 10:57, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the source for the manager (already cited in the article): http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/interviews/a192242/ones-to-watch-marina-and-the-diamonds.html#~pfFPu9SuXQM920
Here's the source for the classical composition course: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/8260821/Im-Marina-Youre-the-Diamonds.html EllenPao (talk) 11:10, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You should then reference those in the article! Accents 11:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm gonna do it, thank you for your help! EllenPao (talk) 11:12, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

???

Hi Accent - I am allgeneral. What is it that is not constructive about a hindu Matang community for you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allgeneral (talkcontribs) 11:24, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mujaddid

Hi Accent! Mmmm, well, I think you are right. I have to agree with you on that one, and it's not a mistake at all. I am glad to find out that you're open-minded. :) Best regards from "The Land of the Pharaohs". :)

Hey there User:BiKaz - looking at the edit again I sort of like your version as well... You do what you think is best! Accents 11:52, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for your kindness and understanding! Salam (peace). ♥ — Preceding unsigned comment added by BiKaz (talkcontribs) 12:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Principality of Sealand

Hi Accents, I do not see what is not "constructive" about a statement that is to this day debated. The UK never made an official claim on Sealand which is why the whole subject is under debate. The statement of Sealand not being grandfathered in has no citation and seem more of a bias statement as both sides have their valid arguements. From the "Creating your own country" documentary, Danny Wallace calls the British embassy to inquire whether Sealand was itself a nation or not to which they were unable to give an answer.