Jump to content

Talk:Adolf Hitler's bodyguard/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 17: Line 17:
{{GATable/item|1a||
{{GATable/item|1a||
*Fix dashes in the citations using a script
*Fix dashes in the citations using a script
*Repeating the same cite over and over again next to each other is unecessary.
}}
}}
<!-- it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. -->
<!-- it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. -->

Revision as of 12:02, 10 July 2015

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (talk · contribs) 11:55, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
  • Fix dashes in the citations using a script
  • Repeating the same cite over and over again next to each other is unecessary.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  • Dab link to "Stateless"
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
  • One ref has a "harv error"
2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment.