User talk:Cagwinn: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:32, 13 July 2015

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bannaventa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brittonic language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On PEREDUR...

Hi Cagwinn,

I was just looking over your edits of the Perceval page, and as I'd rather not get into any misunderstandings, I would like to ask you some questions about PEREDUR. As far as I know, there are two reasonable positions about the tale: One is that it was based off a body of Celtic materials also used by Chretien, the other that it was based off Chretien's romance and the continuations themselves. While you might hold a different opinion, there doesn't seem to be any consensus.

My personal opinion is that, due to the parallels in wording between it and Chretien's story, the third part of the tale, beginning immediately after Peredur is with the empress, is an amalgam based on Chretien, the continuations, and tradition. The parts before that are so radically divergent from Chretien's story that they seem to be taken from traditional sources. I am not pretending to be an expert -- this is an imperfect opinion based on the few materials I've read. Phi (talk) 10:26, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Hi Cagwinn,
-I was just looking over your edits of the [[Perceval]] page, and as I'd rather not get into any misunderstandings, I would like to ask you some questions about PEREDUR. As far as I know, there are two reasonable positions about the tale: One is that it was based off a body of Celtic materials also used by Chretien, the other that it was based off Chretien's romance and the continuations themselves. While you might hold a different opinion, the scholarly consensus suggests otherwise.
+I was just looking over your edits of the [[Perceval]] page, and as I'd rather not get into any misunderstandings, I would like to ask you some questions about PEREDUR. As far as I know, there are two reasonable positions about the tale: One is that it was based off a body of Celtic materials also used by Chretien, the other that it was based off Chretien's romance and the continuations themselves. While you might hold a different opinion, there doesn't seem to be any consensus.
 My personal opinion is that, due to the parallels in wording between it and Chretien's story, the third part of the tale, beginning immediately after Peredur is with the empress, is an amalgam based on Chretien, the continuations, and tradition. The parts before that are so radically divergent from Chretien's story that they seem to be taken from traditional sources. I am not pretending to be an expert -- this is an imperfect opinion based on the few materials I've read. [[User:PhiChiPsiOmega|Phi]] ([[User talk:PhiChiPsiOmega|talk]]) 10:26, 13 July 2015 (UTC)