Talk:70/20/10 model (learning and development): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== |
== |
||
I would like to know which company had use this model, beside google and dell |
I would like to know which company had use this model, beside google and dell |
||
== Allen Tough == |
|||
Professor Tough's research, while also apparently using the number 70, has little to do with this specific model and the idea that 70% of learning comes from tough jobs. Self directed learning could fall under any of the three categories presented. [[Special:Contributions/104.183.198.36|104.183.198.36]] ([[User talk:104.183.198.36|talk]]) 13:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== Salient Criticism== |
== Salient Criticism== |
||
Revision as of 13:46, 11 August 2015
 | Business Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Markup broken. This page is unreadable as it stands. Liam Proven (talk) 13:14, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
== I would like to know which company had use this model, beside google and dell
Allen Tough
Professor Tough's research, while also apparently using the number 70, has little to do with this specific model and the idea that 70% of learning comes from tough jobs. Self directed learning could fall under any of the three categories presented. 104.183.198.36 (talk) 13:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Salient Criticism
I think this article needs a look at the relevant criticisms levied at the "70-20-10" hypothesis in order to make the article more neutral and scientifically sound. 104.183.198.36 (talk) 15:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
bs?
Zxv ewxcv i would like to know if there is any substance to this model. do companies actually track the time for each project and make sure it's the right 70/20/10 distribution?
This might help answer your question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.116.254.200 (talk) 06:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
It does look as if it is an idea with no coherent evidence. The article should be marked for deletion.
Fustbariclation (talk) 00:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
It is very much measurable - please see: https://www.702010forum.com/Posts/view/measuring-the-impact-of-70-20-10 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.151.229.28 (talk) 06:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Major sections of this read like marketing material for the 70 20 10 forum. I would like to see more citations and the removal of the "Strategy" section. 104.183.198.36 (talk) 21:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)