Jump to content

Talk:RG-31 Nyala: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Military Specifics
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Military Specifics ==
== Military Specifics ==


While the public has the freedom to research the blast resistance of the RG-31 and it's variants, I would encourage that specifics on the blast resistance be not published as this information can (and intelligence indicates it has) be used by forces opposing NATO and the U.S., amongst others.
While the public has the freedom to research the blast resistance of the RG-31 and it's variants, I would encourage that specifics on the blast resistance not be published as this information can be used by forces opposing NATO and the U.S., amongst others. (intelligence indicates it has already been used)


As well, I am a RG-31 gunner and seeing the devestation and the explosives used on other RG-31's, I have little doubt that these deaths could have been prevented with the military specifics have not been published online. A main contributor of these specifics, DND101, has recently gone offline. Whether the information is reposted will be left to see soon.
As well, I am a RG-31 gunner and seeing the devestation and the explosives used on another RG-31, I have little doubt that these deaths could have been prevented with the military specifics having not been published online. A main contributor of these specifics, DND101, has recently gone offline. Whether the information is reposted will be left to be seen soon.


My appreciation and thanks to all who contribute to the knowledge of this beautiful and strong AFV.
My appreciation and thanks to all who contribute to the knowledge of this beautiful and strong AFV.

Revision as of 02:52, 4 August 2006

Military Specifics

While the public has the freedom to research the blast resistance of the RG-31 and it's variants, I would encourage that specifics on the blast resistance not be published as this information can be used by forces opposing NATO and the U.S., amongst others. (intelligence indicates it has already been used)

As well, I am a RG-31 gunner and seeing the devestation and the explosives used on another RG-31, I have little doubt that these deaths could have been prevented with the military specifics having not been published online. A main contributor of these specifics, DND101, has recently gone offline. Whether the information is reposted will be left to be seen soon.

My appreciation and thanks to all who contribute to the knowledge of this beautiful and strong AFV.

From Afghanistan, M2