Talk:70/20/10 model (learning and development): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:36, 20 August 2015

Business Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Markup broken. This page is unreadable as it stands. Liam Proven (talk) 13:14, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

== I would like to know which company had use this model, beside google and dell

Allen Tough

Professor Tough's research, while also apparently using the number 70, has little to do with this specific model and the idea that 70% of learning comes from tough jobs. Self directed learning could fall under any of the three categories presented. 104.183.198.36 (talk) 13:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salient Criticism

I think this article needs a look at the relevant criticisms levied at the "70-20-10" hypothesis in order to make the article more neutral and scientifically sound. 104.183.198.36 (talk) 15:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Factual?

Zxv ewxcv i would like to know if there is any substance to this model. do companies actually track the time for each project and make sure it's the right 70/20/10 distribution?

This might help answer your question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.116.254.200 (talk) 06:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It does look as if it is an idea with no coherent evidence. The article should be marked for deletion. Fustbariclation (talk) 00:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This model is based on a significant body of academic research that shows the majority of learning is experiential (the '70') and social (the '20').

It is very much measurable - please see: https://www.702010forum.com/Posts/view/measuring-the-impact-of-70-20-10 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.151.229.28 (talk) 06:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Major sections of this read like marketing material for the 70 20 10 forum. I would like to see more citations and the removal of the "Strategy" section. 104.183.198.36 (talk) 21:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

70:20:10 is an L&D reference model that is used by a large number of organisations across the world. Although the exact ratios of experience:exposure: education vary dependent on context of each organisation there is a body of research that underpins it. See: 70% (Tough, 1971, 1979); 70% (Bruce, Aring, and Brand, 1998); 62% (Zemke, 1985 and Verespej, 1998); 70% (Vader, 1998); 85-90% (Raybold, 2000); 70% (Dobbs, 2000); 75% (Lloyd, 2000) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jchjennings (talk • contribs) 00:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let's keep this section related to the business version of 70:20:10. Start a new section if you'd like to continue defending the LD model. 104.183.198.36 (talk) 16:36, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 00:46, 17 August 2015 edit Jchjennings (talk \| contribs) 24 edits →‎Factual? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:36, 20 August 2015 edit undo 104.183.198.36 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 29:		Line 29:

	70:20:10 is an L&D reference model that is used by a large number of organisations across the world. Although the exact ratios of experience:exposure: education vary dependent on context of each organisation there is a body of research that underpins it. See: 70% (Tough, 1971, 1979); 70% (Bruce, Aring, and Brand, 1998); 62% (Zemke, 1985 and Verespej, 1998); 70% (Vader, 1998); 85-90% (Raybold, 2000); 70% (Dobbs, 2000); 75% (Lloyd, 2000) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jchjennings\|Jchjennings]] ([[User talk:Jchjennings\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jchjennings\|contribs]]) 00:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		70:20:10 is an L&D reference model that is used by a large number of organisations across the world. Although the exact ratios of experience:exposure: education vary dependent on context of each organisation there is a body of research that underpins it. See: 70% (Tough, 1971, 1979); 70% (Bruce, Aring, and Brand, 1998); 62% (Zemke, 1985 and Verespej, 1998); 70% (Vader, 1998); 85-90% (Raybold, 2000); 70% (Dobbs, 2000); 75% (Lloyd, 2000) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jchjennings\|Jchjennings]] ([[User talk:Jchjennings\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jchjennings\|contribs]]) 00:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

			Let's keep this section related to the business version of 70:20:10. Start a new section if you'd like to continue defending the LD model. [[Special:Contributions/104.183.198.36\|104.183.198.36]] ([[User talk:104.183.198.36\|talk]]) 16:36, 20 August 2015 (UTC)