User:Beyond My Ken: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus; the picture throws legal doubt on a huge mass of testimony he has given. It is a huge error, and must be addressed until corrected. |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
------------ |
------------ |
||
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/347340189988471388 |
|||
I don't regularly contribute or edit Wikipedia; the pages is of my father, so naturally I am concerned for my family, especially the great-grandchildren. |
|||
I believe I have established a certain case; the picture shown and the actual picture of my father that has been uploaded to Pinterest https://www.pinterest.com/pin/347340189988471388/ are not the same person; anyone can see that. Why are you so insistent on putting a fake holocaust picture on the page? This is a very important matter. The German people must pay reparations for the crimes of the Nazis, and so every bit of evidence is extremely important. The legal principle is Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. That means that if a German lawyer can find a falsification, such as this obvious one, they can have all of my father's testimony thrown out. It may have been a Trojan horse from the beginning. I'm not saying he wasn't in the camps at the end of the War; he was, and I saw the picture of him taken at Buchenwald, but that isn't him. You are flying in the face of reason and logic by allowing that picture to remain there. It will throw doubt on other matters associated with his written records of an epoch. Jagtig (talk) 22:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:20, 28 August 2015
code thoughts backstory pics edits
it seems to me
that much of life takes place
obscured from view,
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/347340189988471388 I don't regularly contribute or edit Wikipedia; the pages is of my father, so naturally I am concerned for my family, especially the great-grandchildren. I believe I have established a certain case; the picture shown and the actual picture of my father that has been uploaded to Pinterest https://www.pinterest.com/pin/347340189988471388/ are not the same person; anyone can see that. Why are you so insistent on putting a fake holocaust picture on the page? This is a very important matter. The German people must pay reparations for the crimes of the Nazis, and so every bit of evidence is extremely important. The legal principle is Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. That means that if a German lawyer can find a falsification, such as this obvious one, they can have all of my father's testimony thrown out. It may have been a Trojan horse from the beginning. I'm not saying he wasn't in the camps at the end of the War; he was, and I saw the picture of him taken at Buchenwald, but that isn't him. You are flying in the face of reason and logic by allowing that picture to remain there. It will throw doubt on other matters associated with his written records of an epoch. Jagtig (talk) 22:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)