User talk:Namanbapna: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:21, 26 September 2015

Blocked

I don't know what you're playing at when you create accounts to vandalize, only to undo the edits from this account. If this only happened once, I would have considered giving you a warning, but when the activity is this extensive, I feel a block is warranted. The following accounts appear to be ones you created as bad hand accounts:

I've blocked your account for two weeks. If you wish to appeal the block, place the template {{unblock}} below this message. TNXMan 15:26, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Namanbapna (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't create any of these accounts.

Decline reason:

So, we are in agreement that the vandalising and the reverting are being done at the same computer, using the same IP, within moments of each other, but you would have us believe someone else is doing the vandalizing but you aren't quite sure who it is, probably your roomate? You must think we are pretty stupid if you expect us to believe that. This is essentially a spin on the little brother defense and it's not going to convince anyone. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:13, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Blocked again

Since you apparently didn't listen to my last message regarding multiple accounts, I have blocked you indefinitely for operating Art130385 (talk · contribs) and IamfromMoon (talk · contribs). Just to be clear, again, Wikipedia does not permit operation of multiple accounts when you are going to a) edit the same topic area as your main account or b) cause disruption. If you wish to appeal this block, please place {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this message, replacing "Your reason here" with your appeal. TNXMan 15:23, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 I've blocked your account for two weeks. If you wish to appeal the block, place the template {{tlx|unblock}} below this message. <font color="darkorange">[[User:Tnxman307|TN]]</font><b><font color="midnightblue"><big>[[User talk:Tnxman307|X]]</big></font></b><font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/Tnxman307|Man]]</font> 15:26, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
-{{unblock reviewed | 1=It seems there is some misunderstanding. I have created none of these accounts. Its that when I first saw these people vandalize that particular page, I continuously watched those pages for sometime. And somehow two did again and again, and therefore I reverted again. It seems that, (since the internet connection I edit from is used via a whole college and hostel), someone perhaps know when/what I edit wikipedia, and did this to particularly harass me. Perhaps it is my roommate. And furthermore (you can see for yourself) in my 1200 edit history, I have never vandalized anything. Once it accidentally happened for which a talk is there currently on the top (Avatar section). However, If you still feel that I am responsible for this, there is no problem, and I will accept this blocked account. This is something that can be done: If there is some way to completely block account creations from my IP address, you can do so. And that something like this won't happen again. I from my side, will never do anything like this. However, if you still feel that I am responsible for his, I will accept this blocked account. | decline=So, we are in agreement that the vandalising and the reverting are being done at the same computer, using the same IP, within moments of each other, but you would have us believe someone else is doing the vandalizing but you aren't quite sure who it is, probably your roomate? You must think we are pretty stupid if you expect us to believe that. This is essentially a spin on the [[WP:BROTHER|little brother defense]] and it's not going to convince anyone.  [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 17:13, 28 March 2012 (UTC)}}.
+{{unblock reviewed | 1=I didn't create any of these accounts. | decline=So, we are in agreement that the vandalising and the reverting are being done at the same computer, using the same IP, within moments of each other, but you would have us believe someone else is doing the vandalizing but you aren't quite sure who it is, probably your roomate? You must think we are pretty stupid if you expect us to believe that. This is essentially a spin on the [[WP:BROTHER|little brother defense]] and it's not going to convince anyone.  [[User:Beeblebrox|Beeblebrox]] ([[User talk:Beeblebrox|talk]]) 17:13, 28 March 2012 (UTC)}}.
-:For the reviewing admin - the bad-hand edits were reverted by Namanbapna only minutes after they were made, from the same computer and IP address. <font color="darkorange">[[User:Tnxman307|TN]]</font><b><font color="midnightblue"><big>[[User talk:Tnxman307|X]]</big></font></b><font color="red">[[Special:Contributions/Tnxman307|Man]]</font> 15:56, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
->>> That is what I am saying. My roommate being able to see all I do every minute, he is perhaps the cause of this. Can one thing be done? Can a time duration be given to me to assure that any more wrong accounts and edits don't happen again from my IP address? [[User:Namanbapna|Namanbapna]] ([[User talk:Namanbapna#top|talk]]) 16:05, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 == Blocked again ==