Talk:Market liquidity: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 4 discussions to Talk:Market liquidity/Archives/2012. (BOT) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Does El-Erian use "[http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/17/investing-allianz-el-erian-idUSL1N0VR0NS20150217 illusion of liquidity]" to indicate the same issues about which some have used "Cheshire multiple" (see [[Talk:Efficient-market_hypothesis#Cheshire_multiple|Efficient-market hypothesis]])? Under the current setup, most are losers, by definition; yet, this does not come into the discussion (sustainability, for example). [[User:JMSwtlk|jmswtlk]] ([[User talk:JMSwtlk|talk]]) 14:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC) |
Does El-Erian use "[http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/17/investing-allianz-el-erian-idUSL1N0VR0NS20150217 illusion of liquidity]" to indicate the same issues about which some have used "Cheshire multiple" (see [[Talk:Efficient-market_hypothesis#Cheshire_multiple|Efficient-market hypothesis]])? Under the current setup, most are losers, by definition; yet, this does not come into the discussion (sustainability, for example). [[User:JMSwtlk|jmswtlk]] ([[User talk:JMSwtlk|talk]]) 14:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC) |
||
==Market makers and price anticipation== |
|||
Market makers do not "seek (primarily) to profit from anticipated increases or decreases in a particular market price". That is the role of speculators. Market makers seek to profit from a combination of the demand for immediacy (others trading against the market-makers passive quotes at the bid & ask) and generally benefit from a *lack* of price changes. (Volatile markets can be very profitable for market-makers, but this is a result of increased volumes and other market participants valuing immediacy higher, i.e. crossing spreads more readily and trading with more urgency.) |
|||
I am accordingly adjusting the description in the "Overview" paragraph in line with the above. [[User:Afekz|Afekz]] ([[User talk:Afekz|talk]]) 11:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:27, 6 October 2015
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Cheshire multiple
Does El-Erian use "illusion of liquidity" to indicate the same issues about which some have used "Cheshire multiple" (see Efficient-market hypothesis)? Under the current setup, most are losers, by definition; yet, this does not come into the discussion (sustainability, for example). jmswtlk (talk) 14:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Market makers and price anticipation
Market makers do not "seek (primarily) to profit from anticipated increases or decreases in a particular market price". That is the role of speculators. Market makers seek to profit from a combination of the demand for immediacy (others trading against the market-makers passive quotes at the bid & ask) and generally benefit from a *lack* of price changes. (Volatile markets can be very profitable for market-makers, but this is a result of increased volumes and other market participants valuing immediacy higher, i.e. crossing spreads more readily and trading with more urgency.)
I am accordingly adjusting the description in the "Overview" paragraph in line with the above. Afekz (talk) 11:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class Economics articles
- Mid-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- C-Class Finance & Investment articles
- High-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles