Jump to content

Talk:Astrological sign: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 11: Line 11:


----
----

== Astrological sign for graphic designers ==



Some artists/designers referring to this Wikipedia page might still find it difficult to reproduce the astrological signs in high-resolution details. I've found an easy way. Would someone familiar with this article please include this info in the article?
Some artists/designers referring to this Wikipedia page might still find it difficult to reproduce the astrological signs in high-resolution details. I've found an easy way. Would someone familiar with this article please include this info in the article?

Revision as of 07:35, 9 August 2006

OK I've made a start. There's plenty more could be said about each sign. Have fun! Shantavira 12:33, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Someone should show how the months maps to the star signs... Paul 19:06, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How about the dates

I looked this up to find out what sign I am

If you wanted to find out what sign you were, go look over at astrology and look at the constellations. Those list the dates. -- Remixed 12:33, 20 Feb 2006 (UTC)



Astrological sign for graphic designers

Some artists/designers referring to this Wikipedia page might still find it difficult to reproduce the astrological signs in high-resolution details. I've found an easy way. Would someone familiar with this article please include this info in the article?

To produce the 12 signs in a Windows environment, input "^_`abcdefghi" and apply the "Wingdings" font. Voila, you can enlarge to say 50 point font, and output your graphic file to EPS/PNG/JPG format for very fine graphic details.

I will try to demonstrate it here:

^_`abcdefghi.


Regards, Jason

The link

Rulerships & Essential Dignities - Useful resource on planetary rulerships & essential dignities.

leading to

[[1]]

is from an IP having made lots of addition of these pages, most of which seem completely unnecesary, could someone with more insight into these areas please check if the website is notable? Lundse 15:33, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]