Talk:Oliver Loode: Difference between revisions
→Contested deletion: new section |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The first thing that shows up in a Google search for this man is something from the United Nations (http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/member_loode.pdf). The overall problem here is the conflict of interest, and the lack of viewpoints. Perhaps the best approach is to recommend this article for deletion, regular deletion, and get the viewpoint of multiple editors. <span style="background-color: #0066CC; color:white; font-size:12px; height:auto; position:;"> // Posted by larsona ([[User Talk:larsona|<span style="color: white;">Talk</span>]]) // </span> 02:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC) |
The first thing that shows up in a Google search for this man is something from the United Nations (http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/member_loode.pdf). The overall problem here is the conflict of interest, and the lack of viewpoints. Perhaps the best approach is to recommend this article for deletion, regular deletion, and get the viewpoint of multiple editors. <span style="background-color: #0066CC; color:white; font-size:12px; height:auto; position:;"> // Posted by larsona ([[User Talk:larsona|<span style="color: white;">Talk</span>]]) // </span> 02:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Contested deletion == |
|||
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) - this is a translation from existing article in Estonian. The importance of the article (and the individual about whom it is) is not for the author to decide, this was just an attempt at translation. [[User:Oloode|Oloode]] ([[User talk:Oloode|talk]]) 02:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:44, 16 November 2015
Contested deletion... maybe...
The first thing that shows up in a Google search for this man is something from the United Nations (http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/member_loode.pdf). The overall problem here is the conflict of interest, and the lack of viewpoints. Perhaps the best approach is to recommend this article for deletion, regular deletion, and get the viewpoint of multiple editors. // Posted by larsona (Talk) // 02:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) - this is a translation from existing article in Estonian. The importance of the article (and the individual about whom it is) is not for the author to decide, this was just an attempt at translation. Oloode (talk) 02:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)