User talk:Voice of Clam: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Your behaviour since your block expired has been in violation of [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]] and false accusations of vandalism (e.g. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kesha&diff=697953289&oldid=697948623], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:75.162.211.81&diff=prev&oldid=697978539]), therefore I feel my decision not to unblock you at the time was justified. [[User:Optimist on the run|Optimist on the run]] ([[User talk:Optimist on the run#top|talk]]) 07:54, 3 January 2016 (UTC) |
:Your behaviour since your block expired has been in violation of [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]] and false accusations of vandalism (e.g. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kesha&diff=697953289&oldid=697948623], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:75.162.211.81&diff=prev&oldid=697978539]), therefore I feel my decision not to unblock you at the time was justified. [[User:Optimist on the run|Optimist on the run]] ([[User talk:Optimist on the run#top|talk]]) 07:54, 3 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
How was my Kesha edition supposedly a "false accusation of vandalism," according to you? And that was actually one of my questions: supposed "false accusations of vandalism." Why is it "okay" for them to falsely accuse '''me''' of vandalism, then? What about my other "them vs. me" questions that you haven't yet answered? [[Special:Contributions/75.162.211.81|75.162.211.81]] ([[User talk:75.162.211.81|talk]]) 10:39, 3 January 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:41, 3 January 2016
Will you please answer?
My questions from my unblock request were valid, no? Will you please answer them? 75.162.211.81 (talk) 05:45, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- Your behaviour since your block expired has been in violation of WP:BATTLEGROUND and false accusations of vandalism (e.g. [1], [2]), therefore I feel my decision not to unblock you at the time was justified. Optimist on the run (talk) 07:54, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
How was my Kesha edition supposedly a "false accusation of vandalism," according to you? And that was actually one of my questions: supposed "false accusations of vandalism." Why is it "okay" for them to falsely accuse me of vandalism, then? What about my other "them vs. me" questions that you haven't yet answered? 75.162.211.81 (talk) 10:39, 3 January 2016 (UTC)