User talk:212.186.0.108: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:15, 18 January 2016

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 :''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->
-== January 2016 ==
-[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, and [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome to Wikipedia]]. You appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]] with one or more editors according to your reverts at [[:List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events]]. Although repeatedly [[Help:Reverting|reverting or undoing]] another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|normal editing process]], and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] on the [[:Talk:List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events|talk page]].
-If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|editing privileges]]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> —&nbsp;[[User:Jeraphine Gryphon|Jeraphine&nbsp;Gryphon]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Jeraphine Gryphon|talk]])</sup> 16:52, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
-:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->
-Also please don't tell other IP users that they're not allowed to edit. If you're allowed to add something then they're allowed to remove that something, administrators don't have the final say in content disputes, all editors are equal. —&nbsp;[[User:Jeraphine Gryphon|Jeraphine&nbsp;Gryphon]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Jeraphine Gryphon|talk]])</sup> 16:54, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
-:I've told him not to '''undo''' any worthy edit, like mine, unless it's obvious vandalism. --[[Special:Contributions/212.186.0.108|212.186.0.108]] ([[User talk:212.186.0.108#top|talk]]) 21:34, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
-:: Why? Not all improvements are about adding and adding more stuff. There's no rule here saying that IPs aren't allowed to remove things if they provide a valid reason, which he did. (Either way both of you were getting close to edit warring so I gave these warnings to you both.) —&nbsp;[[User:Jeraphine Gryphon|Jeraphine&nbsp;Gryphon]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Jeraphine Gryphon|talk]])</sup> 21:39, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
-:::Well, but what do you wanna reach with this talk? I left the article already alone before you talked to me. And no, he didn't provide a valid reason, but a subjective one. My edits (Irlmaier prophecy) shall be added to the article, I've also given a source, it's worthy information which can even save lifes. --[[Special:Contributions/212.186.0.108|212.186.0.108]] ([[User talk:212.186.0.108#top|talk]]) 21:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
-:::: "shall be added to the article" -- are you implying you will continue to edit war? You can't do that. What I wanna reach with this talk is to help you understand that if you think your edit should stay then you need to reach a consensus on the article's talk page. By the way it's your subjective and wrong opinion that this info could "save lives". Thankfully that's not required though, what is required is that it's a mention-worthy prophecy like the other ones. One source might not be enough to prove it. I don't have an opinion right now on whether it should be included or not. —&nbsp;[[User:Jeraphine Gryphon|Jeraphine&nbsp;Gryphon]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Jeraphine Gryphon|talk]])</sup> 22:50, 7 January 2016 (UTC)