Jump to content

Talk:Reform Group (Ireland): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Dermo69 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
==Irish Parliamentary Party==
==Irish Parliamentary Party==
I don't see the point in having a link to the [[IPP]] here.The reform movement doesn't claim itself to be the successors to the IPP and it's not calling for Ireland to go back to [[Home Rule]].[[User:Dermo69|Dermo69]]
I don't see the point in having a link to the [[IPP]] here.The reform movement doesn't claim itself to be the successors to the IPP and it's not calling for Ireland to go back to [[Home Rule]].[[User:Dermo69|Dermo69]]

==Language Freedom Movement==
I can see why the article on the Language Freedom Movement ''might'' merit a link to the Reform Movement page, but is one in the other direction neccessary? It might be taken to imply that there is a connection which is tenuous at best. [[User:86.43.66.207|86.43.66.207]] 17:55, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:55, 19 August 2006

The Irish Unionist Alliance has similar goals as the Reform Movement of Ireland.Here's a link to their website; [[1]]. - (Aidan Work 04:58, 16 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

There may be come common features in the short term, but that note that the Reform Movement would not support the first objective of the Irish Unionist Alliance "To work for the creation of a new, dynamic and prosperous Ireland within a Federal United Kingdom" or another "To support the retention of the Pound Sterling as the currency of the United Kingdom". --Henrygb 03:28, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Irish Parliamentary Party

I don't see the point in having a link to the IPP here.The reform movement doesn't claim itself to be the successors to the IPP and it's not calling for Ireland to go back to Home Rule.Dermo69

Language Freedom Movement

I can see why the article on the Language Freedom Movement might merit a link to the Reform Movement page, but is one in the other direction neccessary? It might be taken to imply that there is a connection which is tenuous at best. 86.43.66.207 17:55, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]