Talk:Endorsements in the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:45, 28 February 2016

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

European Union Unassessed

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Section for neutral endorsements

Would it be useful to have a section for individuals and groups which have chosen to remain neutral in the article such as many of the UK supermarkets? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.206.59 (talk) 21:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Many businesses have commented on the referendum but refused to endorse either side. These were also included in the List of endorsements in the Scottish independence referendum, 2014 article.

Removed U.S. politicians (censorship)

Some CIA agent here suppresses information about U.S. presidential candidates who support Brexit and whose sources clearly cite that they're anti-EU. That secret agent already once tried to suppress relevant information about EU-critical parties in the article Euroscepticism. Please block that agent forever and add the U.S. politicians back into the paragraph. --212.186.0.108 (talk) 11:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest you read Wikipedia's policy on assuming good faith in others' edits. Accusing editors of being CIA agents is both rude and preposterous. If you can be civil, you are free to explain why you think the citations that were given are sufficient, because I read them and they do not show Rubio or Cruz endorsing a Leave vote. Bondegezou (talk) 11:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why should I explain it as you know everything and your boss only tells you what excuse to tell me in order to suppress worthy information? All three sources stated clearly that Rubio, Bush and Cruz are in favor of Brexit. --212.186.0.108 (talk) 12:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 Some CIA agent here suppresses information about U.S. presidential candidates who support Brexit and whose sources clearly cite that they're anti-EU. That secret agent already once tried to suppress relevant information about EU-critical parties in the article [[Euroscepticism]]. Please block that agent forever and add the U.S. politicians back into the paragraph. --[[Special:Contributions/212.186.0.108|212.186.0.108]] ([[User talk:212.186.0.108|talk]]) 11:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 :I would suggest you read [[WP:AGF|Wikipedia's policy on assuming good faith in others' edits]]. Accusing editors of being CIA agents is both rude and preposterous. If you can be civil, you are free to explain why you think the citations that were given are sufficient, because I read them and they do not show Rubio or Cruz endorsing a Leave vote. [[User:Bondegezou|Bondegezou]] ([[User talk:Bondegezou|talk]]) 11:47, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
+::Why should I explain it as you know everything and your boss only tells you what excuse to tell me in order to suppress worthy information? All three sources stated clearly that Rubio, Bush and Cruz are in favor of Brexit. --[[Special:Contributions/212.186.0.108|212.186.0.108]] ([[User talk:212.186.0.108|talk]]) 12:44, 28 February 2016 (UTC)