User talk:Dewritech

Company Page

Hello Dewritech,

We are a competitor of this company and feel we should also have a page on Wikipedia. I noticed you editing their page recently. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vocus

As an independent editor, would you be able to create a page for our organization?

Connectus Software Baltimore, Maryland connectus.net primary platform; NewsBox.com (platform originally created as PRSafe, a platform for PR professionals, but rebranded as NewsBox at the end of 2012)

http://baltimore.citybizlist.com/article/291134/connectus-software-plans-launch-of-newsbox-version-30

https://twitter.com/newsbox

https://www.crunchbase.com/product/newsbox-com

http://technical.ly/baltimore/2014/12/02/newsbox-gary-pick/

http://technical.ly/baltimore/2015/03/10/baltimore-people-at-sxsw-2015/

https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/connectus#/entity https://www.linkedin.com/in/garypick http://www.meetup.com/TechBreakfast/events/216867642/

http://etcbaltimore.com/2015/07/28/beehive-spotlight-gary-pick-newsbox/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnccoyne (talk • contribs) 14:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello Johnccoyne,

The references do not indicate that company meets WP:CORP.-- Dewritech (talk) 17:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Broadcom?

I noticed you have contributed to articles on Broadcom Corporation and/or Broadcom Limited (formerly Avago Tech). Just a quick note that there is a discussion here about whether or not Broadcom should be a disambiguation page or refer solely to Broadcom Corporation. Cheers! ^{Talk to} SageGreenRider 17:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for notification.-- Dewritech (talk) 20:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Ibeacon

Hello

I´m new contributing Wikipedia. Please, why you consider the sources are not reliable? Now I post it again, and I have provided a new "more realiable" citation so you can ensure the information is highly contrastable with no error or miss-information, but it is in Spanish (I hope that the language not to be a problem in the citation)

http://www.eleconomista.es/apps/noticias/7055571/10/15/gestalia-incorpora-la-tecnologia-de-seeketing-en-sus-centros-comerciales.html http://www.bbvaopen4u.com/en/actualidad/what-are-beacons-and-how-can-they-change-shopping-experience

Thank you for your support

Here you can find more sources/references about Seeketing technology:

http://www.bbvaopen4u.com/en/actualidad/what-are-beacons-and-how-can-they-change-shopping-experience https://www.mobileworldcongress.com/exhibitor/seeketing/ "http://haybeacon.marketing/ibeacons-vs-seeketing/" http://www.digitalassetsdeployment.com/en/business/seeketing/ http://www.bbvaopen4u.com/es/actualidad/como-mejora-nuestra-vida-el-internet-de-las-cosas-siete-aplicaciones-practicas http://awakke.com/observar/ http://www.neodoc.es/en/news/catorce-empresas-participan-desde-ayer-junto-a-neodoc-en-un-programa-de-inmersion-en-silicon-valley https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ibeacons-vs-seeketing-nodes-javier-espadas-bard%C3%B3n- http://thestartupconference.com/exhibitor/seeketing/ http://9to5mac.com/2014/11/19/comscore-ibeacon-app-usage/ http://www.amazon.es/Seeketing-Node-ibeacon-bluetooth-cellular/dp/B00IG0XV9S https://econsultancy.com/blog/65221-ibeacon-trials-13-brands-trying-to-find-a-use-case/ http://mktfan.com/story.php?title=ibeacons-vs-nodos-seeketing http://www.modaes.es/back-stage/20140606/diez-tendencias-clave-para-el-retail-de-moda-en-2015.html http://www.comunicae.es/nota/nace-el-google-analytics-offline_1-1084299/ https://itunes.apple.com/ca/app/we-observe-deals/id1073113719?mt=8 https://datafox.com/seeketing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.218.48.120 (talk) 16:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

but I haven´t included all these (because most are in spanish)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.218.48.120 (talk) 15:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC) 

Mark Labbett

Hi, You messaged me in regards to changing Mark Labbett's page, please can I contact you privately to discuss my changes.

Thank you.

5.64.197.69 (talk) 11:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Discuss on Talk:Mark Labbett.-- Dewritech (talk) 11:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Intereconomics

Dear Dewritech,

I have noticed that you have decide to classify Intereconomics as a maganize. But as stated in Springer (the publisher), it is a journal: http://www.springer.com/economics/policy/journal/10272?countryChanged=true

And if you see the classification in here: http://www.lib.sfu.ca/help/research-assistance/format-type/scholarly-journals you will see that it is not necessary that a journal is peer-reviewed to be a journal (for example: "•The majority of scholarly journals go through the peer-review process, although there are some that are scholarly and non-peer reviewed, such as Journal of financial econometrics."(I am guessing that that is the reason why you changed from journal to magazine. If it is because something else please tell me).

Here you can also see the difference between a peer-reviewed journal and a journal that is not peer-reviewed: http://guides.library.cornell.edu/c.php?g=31867&p=201759

Thank you for your time.