Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Highfive Technologies, Inc.: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:{{pagelinks|Draft:Highfive Technologies, Inc.}} |
:{{pagelinks|Draft:Highfive Technologies, Inc.}} |
||
Rejected 5 times in a row by several different experienced editors. The firm does not appear to be notable enough that here is any potential for an article. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 17:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC) |
Rejected 5 times in a row by several different experienced editors. The firm does not appear to be notable enough that here is any potential for an article. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 17:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Why, there are 8 listed references, most of which are from several different reliable sources. The ones I checked (The Verge, TechCrunch) cover the subject in detail, which convinces me of notability. [[Special:Contributions/103.6.159.89|103.6.159.89]] ([[User talk:103.6.159.89|talk]]) 18:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' Why, there are 8 listed references, most of which are from several different reliable sources. The ones I checked (The Verge, TechCrunch, Inc.) cover the subject in detail, which convinces me of notability. [[Special:Contributions/103.6.159.89|103.6.159.89]] ([[User talk:103.6.159.89|talk]]) 18:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 18:11, 28 March 2016
Rejected 5 times in a row by several different experienced editors. The firm does not appear to be notable enough that here is any potential for an article. DGG ( talk ) 17:35, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Why, there are 8 listed references, most of which are from several different reliable sources. The ones I checked (The Verge, TechCrunch, Inc.) cover the subject in detail, which convinces me of notability. 103.6.159.89 (talk) 18:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)