User talk:LuckyLouie: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:LuckyLouie/Archive 2) (bot |
No edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
-- [[User:GravitationalWavesAreReal|GravitationalWavesAreReal]] ([[User talk:GravitationalWavesAreReal|talk]]) 02:03, 13 April 2016 (UTC) |
-- [[User:GravitationalWavesAreReal|GravitationalWavesAreReal]] ([[User talk:GravitationalWavesAreReal|talk]]) 02:03, 13 April 2016 (UTC) |
||
:I assume you mean that Howe does not want to be identified as a ufologist and conspiracy theorist. We go by what [[WP:FRIND|reliable independent sources]] say. Please read the encyclopedia's policies. - [[User:LuckyLouie|LuckyLouie]] ([[User talk:LuckyLouie#top|talk]]) 02:08, 13 April 2016 (UTC) |
:I assume you mean that Howe does not want to be identified as a ufologist and conspiracy theorist. We go by what [[WP:FRIND|reliable independent sources]] say. Please read the encyclopedia's policies. - [[User:LuckyLouie|LuckyLouie]] ([[User talk:LuckyLouie#top|talk]]) 02:08, 13 April 2016 (UTC) |
||
Why is it OK to allow a criticism section on Wiki? That info is all opinion and not fact. I don't understand your issue with my edit. |
Revision as of 23:14, 14 April 2016
LuckyLouie is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Reply to recent edit on Linda Moulton Howe page
Hi LuckyLouie,
Sorry, is it wrong to remove an element of a wikipedia biography page that the person in question does not want to appear?
-- GravitationalWavesAreReal (talk) 02:03, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- I assume you mean that Howe does not want to be identified as a ufologist and conspiracy theorist. We go by what reliable independent sources say. Please read the encyclopedia's policies. - LuckyLouie (talk) 02:08, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Why is it OK to allow a criticism section on Wiki? That info is all opinion and not fact. I don't understand your issue with my edit.