User talk:Non-dropframe: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Hi! I hate to tell you, but you made a bad revert [[Special:Diff/717998414|here]] when you reinstated unsourced or poorly sourced information about a living person, which is clearly forbidden per [[WP:BLPREMOVE]]. To make it worse, you [[Special:Diff/717998417|warned]] the user who removed the content (granted, they didn't provide any reason for deletion). [[User:Politrukki|Politrukki]] ([[User talk:Politrukki|talk]]) 08:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC) |
Hi! I hate to tell you, but you made a bad revert [[Special:Diff/717998414|here]] when you reinstated unsourced or poorly sourced information about a living person, which is clearly forbidden per [[WP:BLPREMOVE]]. To make it worse, you [[Special:Diff/717998417|warned]] the user who removed the content (granted, they didn't provide any reason for deletion). [[User:Politrukki|Politrukki]] ([[User talk:Politrukki|talk]]) 08:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC) |
||
:Thanks for your message, {{u|Politrukki}}. As you correctly stated, the user did not give an edit summary regarding the content removal. For this reason, I reverted the removal of what appeared to be content containing references. All I need is a reason from a user removing a fairly large block of text. <span style="color:gray;">--</span>[[User:Non-dropframe|<span style="color:Orange;">Non-Dropframe</span>]] [[User talk:Non-dropframe|<span style="color:gray;"><u><sub>talk</sub></u></span>]] 17:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC) |
:Thanks for your message, {{u|Politrukki}}. As you correctly stated, the user did not give an edit summary regarding the content removal. For this reason, I reverted the removal of what appeared to be content containing references. All I need is a reason from a user removing a fairly large block of text. <span style="color:gray;">--</span>[[User:Non-dropframe|<span style="color:Orange;">Non-Dropframe</span>]] [[User talk:Non-dropframe|<span style="color:gray;"><u><sub>talk</sub></u></span>]] 17:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC) |
||
My concern is that you're allowing a criticism section manned by two people to remain but my HIGHLY-sourced praise section got deleted. Sounds like a wiki editor LuckyLouie, to be exact, is letting his personal bias interfere with fair wiki editing. |
|||
Revision as of 17:59, 2 May 2016
| This is Non-dropframe's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Re: Crash2414
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
hi, you reverted my contribution to the name of the company Finmecccanica. it is in a process of rebranding, and the website www.finmeccanica.com does not exist anymore, as the new name is leonardocompany.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mogra (talk • contribs) 23:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
finmeccanica new name leonardo finmeccanica
please would you explain why you say I am vandalizing Wikipedia, as I am contributing to the Finmeccanica page adding is new name Leonardo? have a look here: http://www.ansa.it/english/news/2016/04/28/-finmeccanica-meeting-approves-new-name-leonardo-_995b8ba5-2ad1-4a79-b9d4-13c8c04becd3.html
what is your problem? explain please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mogra (talk • contribs) 00:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hi there, Mogra. I reverted this change because initially you provided no edit summary and then provided an edit summary with a link to a website that requires a password. If the company does indeed require a name change, please provide a good reference and consider moving the page to the correct name. Further, I'd suggest you read WP:COI as I suspect you likely have a close tie to this organization. Thank you, --Non-Dropframe talk 17:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Bad revert at Jon Kedrowski
Hi! I hate to tell you, but you made a bad revert here when you reinstated unsourced or poorly sourced information about a living person, which is clearly forbidden per WP:BLPREMOVE. To make it worse, you warned the user who removed the content (granted, they didn't provide any reason for deletion). Politrukki (talk) 08:18, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message, Politrukki. As you correctly stated, the user did not give an edit summary regarding the content removal. For this reason, I reverted the removal of what appeared to be content containing references. All I need is a reason from a user removing a fairly large block of text. --Non-Dropframe talk 17:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
My concern is that you're allowing a criticism section manned by two people to remain but my HIGHLY-sourced praise section got deleted. Sounds like a wiki editor LuckyLouie, to be exact, is letting his personal bias interfere with fair wiki editing.