User talk:2601:602:100:DC9C:9C1B:C77D:DEA8:309A: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
again this is not a personal attack and if you think it so that is your unfounded opinion and id ask you rethink your interactions with anons as an admin
again this is not a personal attack and if you think it so that is your unfounded opinion and id ask you rethink your interactions with anons as an admin


if that is all ill be getting back to work now there are 100s of thousands of edits your claiming are immaculate like I haven't fixed anything.
if that is all ill be getting back to work now there are over a hundred thousand edits your claiming are immaculate like I haven't fixed anything, consider it an audit.

I noted your disbelief and went back to the beginning of dougs work, I see why you feel the way you do and apologize for questioning your judgement, he has clearly done more good then harm but harm is there and I will at least be skimming the whole of his edit history, again this is not vindictive, I'm up to 2008 and only two things have caught my eye, a copyright caused some history to be hidden but he seems to have been in the right there and a single insertion of the word alleged that is inappropriate/unfounded, I'm not sure what changed or when but I am genuinely concerned for the community and acting only to correct clear errors/vandalism, I feel I better understand your position now but id ask you to look at it from my perspective, as a detective what other leads do I have? is he suspect? yes but I'm investigating, not attacking.

also as irrational as it is, when you senselessly accuse me of things I'm clearly not doing it makes me want to do those things so I can show you what they look like, to educate you, as my father would say "ill give you something to cry about" please notice that I am not deleting everything, changing my IP or making any attempt at subterfuge here and stop making unfounded accusations.


== May 2016 ==
== May 2016 ==

Revision as of 00:14, 31 May 2016

Targeted edits

You appear to be following and reverting Doug Weller's edits on purpose. Please explain, or else stop. Acroterion (talk) 21:52, 30 May 2016 (UTC

I have explained, I will reiterate, I believe that Doug Weller is incompetent or a vandal, I have seen much evidence for this while checking his work, this is not vindictive, I am genuinely concerned for the community and acting to correct clear errors.

You are wrong. Please reconsider your approach to interactions with other editors. If you make another personal attack I wil block this IP. Acroterion (talk) 22:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

again this is not a personal attack and if you think it so that is your unfounded opinion and id ask you rethink your interactions with anons as an admin

if that is all ill be getting back to work now there are over a hundred thousand edits your claiming are immaculate like I haven't fixed anything, consider it an audit.

I noted your disbelief and went back to the beginning of dougs work, I see why you feel the way you do and apologize for questioning your judgement, he has clearly done more good then harm but harm is there and I will at least be skimming the whole of his edit history, again this is not vindictive, I'm up to 2008 and only two things have caught my eye, a copyright caused some history to be hidden but he seems to have been in the right there and a single insertion of the word alleged that is inappropriate/unfounded, I'm not sure what changed or when but I am genuinely concerned for the community and acting only to correct clear errors/vandalism, I feel I better understand your position now but id ask you to look at it from my perspective, as a detective what other leads do I have? is he suspect? yes but I'm investigating, not attacking.

also as irrational as it is, when you senselessly accuse me of things I'm clearly not doing it makes me want to do those things so I can show you what they look like, to educate you, as my father would say "ill give you something to cry about" please notice that I am not deleting everything, changing my IP or making any attempt at subterfuge here and stop making unfounded accusations.

May 2016

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Dogon people. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 21:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

my changes to the dogon wiki have been sourced, explained and elaborated on to Ad nauseam, it seems 1+1 is to complicated for some admins.