Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Muffizainu

Muffizainu

Muffizainu (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ Muffizainu/Archive.

22 June 2016

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

• Muffizainu (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Immmmanuel (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Muffizainu is the parent sock which was warned many times about the sanctions on dawoodi bohra topics due to succession controversy by the admins, this new sock Immanuel was created and he is directly accessing the sandbox of Muffizainu suddenly which means both are actually same:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Muffizainu/sandbox&oldid=725381425

I got the above diff from Immanuel contribution page.

Also like before they both have again started disrupting the Mufaddal Saifuddin page adding many promotional materials for the single faction which he supports:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mufaddal_Saifuddin&action=history

The entire FGM section was blanked out by staging a farce consensus between Immanuel and Muffizainu

Also see the other activities of both users they are completely devoted to narrow list of articles. And work almost at the same times.

I have successfully reported many socks in the dawoodi bohra domain and most were correct . Summichum (talk) 09:05, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

---