Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milena Roucka: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
The Future (talk | contribs) Strong Keep |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[Milena Roucka]]=== |
===[[Milena Roucka]]=== |
||
* '''Keep Please''' I have needed lots of info on her lately, and this has been the best place to find it. All of the Diva Search contestants should be kept on Wikipedia at least until the next Diva Search takes place. If the contestants aren't in the WWE by that time, it is safe to delete her article. 29 August 2006 |
|||
Because WP is not a crystal ball |
Because WP is not a crystal ball |
||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wp:not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball 1] and just because one is signed to a WWE developmental territory does not mean they are instantly notable or that they would appear on WWE programming beyond diva search. [[User:Renosecond|Renosecond]] 23:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC) |
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wp:not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_crystal_ball 1] and just because one is signed to a WWE developmental territory does not mean they are instantly notable or that they would appear on WWE programming beyond diva search. [[User:Renosecond|Renosecond]] 23:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:34, 29 August 2006
- Keep Please I have needed lots of info on her lately, and this has been the best place to find it. All of the Diva Search contestants should be kept on Wikipedia at least until the next Diva Search takes place. If the contestants aren't in the WWE by that time, it is safe to delete her article. 29 August 2006
Because WP is not a crystal ball 1 and just because one is signed to a WWE developmental territory does not mean they are instantly notable or that they would appear on WWE programming beyond diva search. Renosecond 23:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, the sooner the better. --Yamla 00:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep I can't believe how many WWE Diva Search-related attempted deletions I've stumbled into over the past couple days. Allow me to use some precedent: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Weber This discussion was just resolved a day ago in favor of keep. I think we've pretty well established that people who are featured as contestants on the Diva Search are notable, particularly in a case like this where they had been featured on television for weeks and weeks. -Umdunno 00:23, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. Amy Weber is much more notable at this moment than the one I just flagged for deletion. This person has been on WWE TV, usually in a brief, non-speaking role, as a CONTESTANT for maybe 3 or 4 weeks. Webber was probably notable enough anyway due to her role on Son of the Beach, even before the diva search. That is a horrible, piss-poor precedent, not even a shade comparable to this. I think my "crystal ball" agrument is far stronger than yours. Renosecond 03:24, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I'm going to apologize for claiming the Diva Search precedent, as I hadn't realized yet so many were up for deletion (as you well know) though I don't think it would make a "piss-poor" precedent. Anyway, let's see where all these articles end up.-Umdunno 03:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, and I added a comment to your talk page about the current discussion about this whole Diva Search situation in the relevant Wikiproject. -Umdunno 03:34, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. Amy Weber is much more notable at this moment than the one I just flagged for deletion. This person has been on WWE TV, usually in a brief, non-speaking role, as a CONTESTANT for maybe 3 or 4 weeks. Webber was probably notable enough anyway due to her role on Son of the Beach, even before the diva search. That is a horrible, piss-poor precedent, not even a shade comparable to this. I think my "crystal ball" agrument is far stronger than yours. Renosecond 03:24, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep per Umdunno. TJ Spyke 00:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - as with other reality show contestants, unless there is some other documentation of notability, there does not need to be a separate article. -- Whpq 16:00, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep "just because one is signed to a WWE developmental territory does not mean they are instantly notable or that they would appear on WWE programming" This could be said of nearly anyone currently in a developmental territory, and if that is the precident by which deletions will be made, many more would have to occur beyond this one article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.124.106.90 (talk • contribs)
- Strong Keep She'e more than a reality show contestant. From what I looked up, she's been on WWE television for more than the past month and she was recently contracted to the WWE following the contest. She's a model and actress so I think since she's contracted to WWE, there's probably going to be more updates on her new job in the near future. I think it's safe to say that she meets WP:N. — The Future 23:02, 28 August 2006 (UTC)