Jump to content

Bertram Forer: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
KasparBot (talk | contribs)
m added inline references
Line 1: Line 1:
{{no footnotes|date=April 2014}}
{{no footnotes|date=April 2014}}


'''Bertram R. Forer''' (24 October 1914 – 6 April 2000) was an [[United States|American]] [[psychology|psychologist]] best known for describing the [[Forer effect]], sometimes referred to as [[subjective validation]].
'''Bertram R. Forer''' (24 October 1914 – 6 April 2000) was an [[United States|American]] [[psychology|psychologist]] best known for describing the [[Forer effect]], sometimes referred to as [[subjective validation]].<ref>http://www.umass.edu/umassmag/archives/2001/winter2001/inmemoriam.html Death notice] UMassMag, Winter 2001</ref>


Born in [[Springfield, Massachusetts]], Forer graduated from [[University of Massachusetts Amherst]] in 1936. He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in clinical psychology from [[University of California, Los Angeles]].
Born in [[Springfield, Massachusetts]], Forer graduated from [[University of Massachusetts Amherst]] in 1936. He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in clinical psychology from [[University of California, Los Angeles]].
Line 7: Line 7:
He served as a psychologist and administrator in a [[military hospital]] in France during [[World War II]]. Upon return he worked in a [[United States Department of Veterans Affairs|Veterans Administration]] mental clinic in Los Angeles; and in private practice in [[Malibu, California]].
He served as a psychologist and administrator in a [[military hospital]] in France during [[World War II]]. Upon return he worked in a [[United States Department of Veterans Affairs|Veterans Administration]] mental clinic in Los Angeles; and in private practice in [[Malibu, California]].


In his classic 1948 experiment, Forer administered a [[personality test]] to his students. Rather than scoring the tests and giving individual assessments, he gave all the students exactly the same analysis copied from a newspaper [[astrology]] column. The students were then asked to evaluate the description on a scale of zero through five, with five being the most accurate. The average evaluation was 4.26. The experiment has been repeated hundreds of times since 1948, and the average remains about 4.2.
In his classic 1948 experiment, Forer administered a [[personality test]] to his students. Rather than scoring the tests and giving individual assessments, he gave all the students exactly the same analysis copied from a newspaper [[astrology]] column. The students were then asked to evaluate the description on a scale of zero through five, with five being the most accurate. The average evaluation was 4.26.<ref>http://apsychoserver.psych.arizona.edu/JJBAReprints/PSYC621/Forer_The%20fallacy%20of%20personal%20validation_1949.pdf Forer BR (1949). The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility ''Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology''. 44, 118-123</ref><ref>Forer BR (1968). Personal validation and the person. ''Psychol Rep''. 1968 Dec;23(3):1214. PMID 5717433</ref> The experiment has been repeated hundreds of times since 1948, and the average remains about 4.2.<ref>Forer BR, Farberow NL, Meter MM, Tolman RS (1952). Consistency and agreement in the judgment of Rorschach signs. ''J Proj Tech''. 1952 Sep;16(3):346-51. PMID 14946755</ref>


The Forer effect shows that people tend to accept generalised descriptions of their personalities without realising that the same evaluation could apply to nearly anyone else, because people want the results to be true. This experiment is frequently cited as criticisms of other [[personality test]]s, like the [[Myers-Briggs Type Indicator]].
The Forer effect shows that people tend to accept generalised descriptions of their personalities without realising that the same evaluation could apply to nearly anyone else, because people want the results to be true. This experiment is frequently cited as criticisms of other [[personality test]]s, like the [[Myers-Briggs Type Indicator]].


==References==
==References==

*[http://apsychoserver.psych.arizona.edu/JJBAReprints/PSYC621/Forer_The%20fallacy%20of%20personal%20validation_1949.pdf Forer BR (1949). The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility ''Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology''. 44, 118-123].
*Forer BR (1968). Personal validation and the person. ''Psychol Rep''. 1968 Dec;23(3):1214. PMID 5717433
*Forer BR, Farberow NL, Meter MM, Tolman RS (1952). Consistency and agreement in the judgment of Rorschach signs. ''J Proj Tech''. 1952 Sep;16(3):346-51. PMID 14946755
*[http://www.umass.edu/umassmag/archives/2001/winter2001/inmemoriam.html Death notice] UMassMag, Winter 2001.


{{Authority control}}
{{Authority control}}

Revision as of 12:36, 8 July 2016

Bertram R. Forer (24 October 1914 – 6 April 2000) was an American psychologist best known for describing the Forer effect, sometimes referred to as subjective validation.[1]

Born in Springfield, Massachusetts, Forer graduated from University of Massachusetts Amherst in 1936. He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in clinical psychology from University of California, Los Angeles.

He served as a psychologist and administrator in a military hospital in France during World War II. Upon return he worked in a Veterans Administration mental clinic in Los Angeles; and in private practice in Malibu, California.

In his classic 1948 experiment, Forer administered a personality test to his students. Rather than scoring the tests and giving individual assessments, he gave all the students exactly the same analysis copied from a newspaper astrology column. The students were then asked to evaluate the description on a scale of zero through five, with five being the most accurate. The average evaluation was 4.26.[2][3] The experiment has been repeated hundreds of times since 1948, and the average remains about 4.2.[4]

The Forer effect shows that people tend to accept generalised descriptions of their personalities without realising that the same evaluation could apply to nearly anyone else, because people want the results to be true. This experiment is frequently cited as criticisms of other personality tests, like the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.

References

  1. ^ http://www.umass.edu/umassmag/archives/2001/winter2001/inmemoriam.html Death notice] UMassMag, Winter 2001
  2. ^ http://apsychoserver.psych.arizona.edu/JJBAReprints/PSYC621/Forer_The%20fallacy%20of%20personal%20validation_1949.pdf Forer BR (1949). The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 44, 118-123
  3. ^ Forer BR (1968). Personal validation and the person. Psychol Rep. 1968 Dec;23(3):1214. PMID 5717433
  4. ^ Forer BR, Farberow NL, Meter MM, Tolman RS (1952). Consistency and agreement in the judgment of Rorschach signs. J Proj Tech. 1952 Sep;16(3):346-51. PMID 14946755