User talk:173.161.39.97: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Neutrality (talk | contribs) →July 2016: new section |
cleaning |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:''' |
|||
The Arbitration Committee has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding [[Landmark Worldwide]], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Landmark Worldwide|here]]. |
|||
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. |
|||
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
|||
== Welcome to Wikipedia! == |
|||
Hello, and [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome]] to Wikipedia! Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/173.161.39.97|your contributions]]. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|The five pillars of Wikipedia]] |
|||
* [[Help:Contents|Help pages]] |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Tutorial|Tutorial]] |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|How to edit a page]] and [[Wikipedia:Article development|How to develop articles]] |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style|Simplified Manual of Style]] |
|||
* [[Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual|Intuitive guide to Wikipedia]] |
|||
You are welcome to continue editing without [[Special:Userlogin|logging in]], but you may want to consider '''<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Special:Userlogin|type=signup}} creating an account]</span>'''. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|this page]]. If you edit without a username, your [[IP address]] (173.161.39.97) is used to identify you instead. |
|||
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! Please [[Wikipedia:Signatures|sign your comments]] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]], ask me on [[User talk:Cirt|my talk page]], or ask your question and then place <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[:Category:Wikipedians looking for help|helpme]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code> before the question on this page. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:welcome-anon --> — '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 20:41, 23 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== January 2015 == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, and [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome to Wikipedia]]. You appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]] with one or more editors according to your reverts at [[:Landmark Worldwide]]. Although repeatedly [[Help:Reverting|reverting or undoing]] another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|normal editing process]], and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] on the [[:Talk:Landmark Worldwide|talk page]]. |
|||
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|block]]. |
|||
''While I personally agree with your removals from the article, understand that you will need to discuss these issues on the article talk page. Continuing to revert others will likely result in your being blocked from editing at all. Thank you.''<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Tgeairn|Tgeairn]] ([[User talk:Tgeairn|talk]]) 19:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] This is your '''only warning'''; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at [[:Landmark Worldwide]], you may be '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-delete4im --> [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 19:40, 30 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''36 hours''' for [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]] and violating the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], as you did at [[:Landmark Worldwide]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 19:56, 30 January 2015 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> |
|||
:''If this is a [[Network address translation|shared IP address]], and you did not make the edits, consider [[Wikipedia:Why create an account?|creating an account]] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
|||
{{unblock reviewed|reason= I only removed material that attacked real living people. That is not a violation of revert rules according to the link above. [[Special:Contributions/173.161.39.97|173.161.39.97]] ([[User talk:173.161.39.97#top|talk]]) 20:02, 30 January 2015 (UTC)|decline=I've looked at the edits, and I'm confident the exemption you're referring to doesn't apply here as you were removing neutrally worded sourced content. The exemption is not intended to allow editors to remove any and all criticism. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 20:28, 30 January 2015 (UTC)}} |
|||
[[User:PhilKnight]], how is falsely saying someone was indicted for tax fraud neutral? It wasn't even sourced (because it is untrue). How is accusations of having offshore accounts, phoney loans, fraudulent transactions all neutral? Also not in the supposed source. How is saying Erhard hired scientologists neutral, without any proof? I don't understand what is going on here. How can someone make all of these accusals? The only source given is a fictional book by Pressman, and even it doesn't say these things. The rules say its okay to remove libellous material from biographies. That's what I'm trying to do. [[Special:Contributions/173.161.39.97|173.161.39.97]] ([[User talk:173.161.39.97#top|talk]]) 20:53, 30 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
{{Admin help-helped}} |
|||
In the time have been waiting, [[User:Cathar66]], [[User:Tgeairn]], [[User:Legacypac]], [[User:IronGargoyle]], [[User:Asyntax]] have put more falsehoods on the page. These are attacks against real people. They are untrue and they lie about their source. Please help. [[Special:Contributions/173.161.39.97|173.161.39.97]] ([[User talk:173.161.39.97#top|talk]]) 22:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Please tell me who to go to for help. How can you support these lies? [[Special:Contributions/173.161.39.97|173.161.39.97]] ([[User talk:173.161.39.97#top|talk]]) 22:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
:Please be specific. Which statements added to the article are incorrect, and how? The given sources largely seem to back up the claims about various indictments or charges for tax-related issues. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 22:50, 30 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== July 2016 == |
== July 2016 == |
||
Revision as of 14:33, 23 July 2016
July 2016
Do not mass-delete material, as you did at Tim Kaine, without discussion at talk. Further such actions may result in a block. --Neutralitytalk 23:35, 22 July 2016 (UTC)