Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iniced: Difference between revisions
→Suspected sockpuppets: typo |
removed mt |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> |
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> |
||
{{SPIarchive notice|Iniced}} |
|||
{{SPIpriorcases}} |
|||
===07 August 2016=== |
|||
{{SPI case status|}} |
|||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
Revision as of 07:45, 7 August 2016
Suspected sockpuppets
- ThetriviaBlanker (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Thegetingridoftriviauser (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
I noticed many similarities among these users. Iniced has made it known they do not approve of trivia. ThetriviaBlanker and Thegetingridoftriviauser were single purpose troll accounts who would remove trivia from the same Tom and Jerry articles Iniced did. Same deal with the example IP I listed. I know there are many more troll accounts like ThetriviaBlanker/Thegettingridoftriviauser and IP's that I just can't remember at the moment. Iniced also has a very unique way of replacing apostrophes with commas in edit summaries and occasionally misspelling their name as "inced" as seen on their talk page: Compare this edit summary with this, and also this and this with this. Call me crazy, but I think these are all the same person. If this really is just a coincidence though my sincerest apologies, Iniced. Sro23 (talk) 03:53, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.