User talk:Iloveinfo22: Difference between revisions
→Warning: new section |
Iloveinfo22 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Most of your input at Wikipedia has been promoting Michael Greger, through edit warring. The article has had to be protected as a result. Wikipedia is not a platform for promoting questionable medical claims, and if you continue this you may be blocked from editing. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 06:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC) |
Most of your input at Wikipedia has been promoting Michael Greger, through edit warring. The article has had to be protected as a result. Wikipedia is not a platform for promoting questionable medical claims, and if you continue this you may be blocked from editing. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 06:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC) |
||
Just because I made an edit on an article that was reverted without explanation doesn't mean you should censor my right to edit future articles. I have been participating on the article's discussion page, and it was not because of me that the page was blocked (there were other users who tried to revert my edits repeatedly without explanation). |
|||
Revision as of 04:48, 1 September 2016
August 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Michael Greger. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 13:26, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Iloveinfo22 reported by User:Alexbrn (Result: ). Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 18:50, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Notification of DRN discussion of Michael Greger
I requested dispute resolution on Michael Greger concerning the material you attempted to remove. --Sammy1339 (talk) 09:43, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Warning
Most of your input at Wikipedia has been promoting Michael Greger, through edit warring. The article has had to be protected as a result. Wikipedia is not a platform for promoting questionable medical claims, and if you continue this you may be blocked from editing. Guy (Help!) 06:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Just because I made an edit on an article that was reverted without explanation doesn't mean you should censor my right to edit future articles. I have been participating on the article's discussion page, and it was not because of me that the page was blocked (there were other users who tried to revert my edits repeatedly without explanation).