Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thommuvtt: Difference between revisions
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
I claim that the contents removed were not blunder, but informative content about the city [[Kottayam]]. Being aware of the problem of reverting multiple times, instead of reverting the content for the second time, I asked my friend who has the user name "pondssandal" to revert. But right now it is being said is sock puppetry. But isn't there any problem for the vandalism committed by [[User:Fortuna_Imperatrix_Mundi]] on the [[Kottayam]] article ? The edits by him on our article is very harsh. They are making the article meaning less and less informative. Now [[User:Chaheel_Riens]] and [[Sro23]] are reverting our article. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Thommuvtt|Thommuvtt]] ([[User talk:Thommuvtt#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Thommuvtt|contribs]]) 11:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
I claim that the contents removed were not blunder, but informative content about the city [[Kottayam]]. Being aware of the problem of reverting multiple times, instead of reverting the content for the second time, I asked my friend who has the user name "pondssandal" to revert. But right now it is being said is sock puppetry. But isn't there any problem for the vandalism committed by [[User:Fortuna_Imperatrix_Mundi]] on the [[Kottayam]] article ? The edits by him on our article is very harsh. They are making the article meaning less and less informative. Now [[User:Chaheel_Riens]] and [[Sro23]] are reverting our article. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Thommuvtt|Thommuvtt]] ([[User talk:Thommuvtt#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Thommuvtt|contribs]]) 11:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:I'll comment here as it makes sense to do so rather on a respective talk page - but for the benefit of [[User:Thommuvtt|Thommuvtt]], if the above is true (although account creation and edits by Pondssandal make this a dubious claim) and you asked your friend to weigh in on your behalf, then this is called [[Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Meatpuppetry|Meatpuppetry]] and is frowned on as much as sockpuppetry is. [[User:Chaheel Riens|Chaheel Riens]] ([[User talk:Chaheel Riens|talk]]) 12:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC) |
:I'll comment here as it makes sense to do so rather on a respective talk page - but for the benefit of [[User:Thommuvtt|Thommuvtt]], if the above is true (although account creation and edits by Pondssandal make this a dubious claim) and you asked your friend to weigh in on your behalf, then this is called [[Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Meatpuppetry|Meatpuppetry]] and is frowned on as much as sockpuppetry is. [[User:Chaheel Riens|Chaheel Riens]] ([[User talk:Chaheel Riens|talk]]) 12:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC) |
||
Well we may surrender about [[Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Meatpuppetry|Meatpuppetry]] but in this case please stop deleting load of data from [[Kottayam]]. Sorry about all the indecent expressions from me. But I still request [[User:Fortuna_Imperatrix_Mundi]],[[User:Chaheel_Riens]] and [[Sro23]] to stop reverting it. Because I can't find anything wrong. I you feel something is violating laws in the article, please make it to my notice so that I can edit with my rich knowledge abut my city [[Kottayam]]. After all I know more than you about Kotayam. So, can I re revert it tommorow with all the edits you suggest? |
|||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
Revision as of 13:26, 16 September 2016
Thommuvtt
- Thommuvtt (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: confirmed
16 September 2016
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Pondssandal (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
I recently removed a large chunk of poor material from the Kottayam article. At 10:45 today I was messaged by User:Thommuvtt and again at 11:19 in which, whilst displaying a tendency towards ownership, he informed me that I will change it if it is needed to be so. At 10:53 today, User: Pondssandal was created, and their first edit THREE minutes later was to revert me and restore the chunk of material. Muffled Pocketed 11:33, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I claim that the contents removed were not blunder, but informative content about the city Kottayam. Being aware of the problem of reverting multiple times, instead of reverting the content for the second time, I asked my friend who has the user name "pondssandal" to revert. But right now it is being said is sock puppetry. But isn't there any problem for the vandalism committed by User:Fortuna_Imperatrix_Mundi on the Kottayam article ? The edits by him on our article is very harsh. They are making the article meaning less and less informative. Now User:Chaheel_Riens and Sro23 are reverting our article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thommuvtt (talk • contribs) 11:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- I'll comment here as it makes sense to do so rather on a respective talk page - but for the benefit of Thommuvtt, if the above is true (although account creation and edits by Pondssandal make this a dubious claim) and you asked your friend to weigh in on your behalf, then this is called Meatpuppetry and is frowned on as much as sockpuppetry is. Chaheel Riens (talk) 12:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Well we may surrender about Meatpuppetry but in this case please stop deleting load of data from Kottayam. Sorry about all the indecent expressions from me. But I still request User:Fortuna_Imperatrix_Mundi,User:Chaheel_Riens and Sro23 to stop reverting it. Because I can't find anything wrong. I you feel something is violating laws in the article, please make it to my notice so that I can edit with my rich knowledge abut my city Kottayam. After all I know more than you about Kotayam. So, can I re revert it tommorow with all the edits you suggest?