Talk:Regenerative circuit: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tesla coil is not a communications circuit |
citation please |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Communications circuit== |
==Communications circuit== |
||
The regenerative circuit is an electronic design for a radio receiver. The Tesla coil is a different class of device. See the article category at the bottom of the page. It belongs in a different article. Perhaps you might want to create one such as [[High voltage generator]]. --[[User:Blainster|Blainster]] 21:59, 15 March 2006 (UTC) |
The regenerative circuit is an electronic design for a radio receiver. The Tesla coil is a different class of device. See the article category at the bottom of the page. It belongs in a different article. Perhaps you might want to create one such as [[High voltage generator]]. --[[User:Blainster|Blainster]] 21:59, 15 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
==Unsourced claim== |
|||
In the absence of evidence for the claim: |
|||
"There is some evidence to suggest that the regenerative circuit was discovered by Robert Goddard before Armstrong or De Forest. Goddard declined to apply for a patent,not wanting to endure litigation. He turned to liquid fuel rocket development." |
|||
I removed it. If someone can find a reliable citation, please cite the source. [[User:Salsb|Salsb]] 11:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:41, 6 September 2006
Communications circuit
The regenerative circuit is an electronic design for a radio receiver. The Tesla coil is a different class of device. See the article category at the bottom of the page. It belongs in a different article. Perhaps you might want to create one such as High voltage generator. --Blainster 21:59, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Unsourced claim
In the absence of evidence for the claim: "There is some evidence to suggest that the regenerative circuit was discovered by Robert Goddard before Armstrong or De Forest. Goddard declined to apply for a patent,not wanting to endure litigation. He turned to liquid fuel rocket development." I removed it. If someone can find a reliable citation, please cite the source. Salsb 11:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)