Talk:Texas Wrestling Academy: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Message to Lomn re:Citations: broadband site templates aren't really policy |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Do not remove citation needed templates for information that is not cited. Removal constitutes vandalism in no uncertain terms just as much as readding of templates for wrestlers already cited constitutes vandalism.[[User:JB196|JB196]] 00:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC) |
Do not remove citation needed templates for information that is not cited. Removal constitutes vandalism in no uncertain terms just as much as readding of templates for wrestlers already cited constitutes vandalism.[[User:JB196|JB196]] 00:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC) |
||
:Actually, neither is the case. Citation templates, particularly item-for-item, are discretionary. What's inappropriate is the removal of sourced information and references, though I understand that that incident was unintentional. — [[User:Lomn|Lomn]] | [[User talk:Lomn|Talk]] 15:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC) |
:Actually, neither is the case. Citation templates, particularly item-for-item, are discretionary. What's inappropriate is the removal of sourced information and references, though I understand that that incident was unintentional. — [[User:Lomn|Lomn]] | [[User talk:Lomn|Talk]] 15:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC) |
||
- So what do you proposee?[[User:JB196|JB196]] 15:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==Re: Lid== |
==Re: Lid== |
||
Revision as of 15:10, 7 September 2006
Message to Lomn re:Citations
Do not remove citation needed templates for information that is not cited. Removal constitutes vandalism in no uncertain terms just as much as readding of templates for wrestlers already cited constitutes vandalism.JB196 00:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, neither is the case. Citation templates, particularly item-for-item, are discretionary. What's inappropriate is the removal of sourced information and references, though I understand that that incident was unintentional. — Lomn | Talk 15:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- So what do you proposee?JB196 15:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Re: Lid
As stated already, application of official Wikipedia citation policy takes precedent over analysis of user motives (questionable or not) in applying Wikipedia citation policy. If something needs to be cited, it needs to be cited, regardless of who it is cited by.JB196 15:03, 7 September 2006 (UTC)