User talk:JP.Martin-Flatin: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:06, 30 November 2016

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JP.Martin-Flatin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fiber (mathematics)

Why did you revert my edit?

First of all, there is no real reason why the reverted section should be in this article, it would fit equally well under inverse image, preimage or value set
The reverted section fits more into a math book, and not into an encyclopedia. It doesn't explain the notion of a fiber or give deeper insights, is rather a discussion on a meta level.
The reverted section contains no sources, and sounds rather like an opinion piece.

--Roman3 (talk) 17:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
 <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/27&oldid=750603218 -->
+== Fiber (mathematics) ==
+Why did you revert my edit?
+* First of all, there is no real reason why the reverted section should be in this article, it would fit equally well under inverse image, preimage or value set
+* The reverted section fits more into a math book, and not into an encyclopedia. It doesn't explain the notion of a fiber or give deeper insights, is rather a discussion on a meta level.
+* The reverted section contains no sources, and sounds rather like an opinion piece.
+--[[User:Roman3|Roman3]] ([[User talk:Roman3|talk]]) 17:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)