Jump to content

Talk:List of progressive metal artists: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Stahn (talk | contribs)
Metallica and Iron Maiden
Stahn (talk | contribs)
Line 40: Line 40:
== Metallica and Iron Maiden ==
== Metallica and Iron Maiden ==


I added both. All first Metallica albums are conceptual albums and latest Maiden works are pretty prog for my tastes.
I added both. All first Metallica albums are conceptual albums and latest Maiden works are pretty prog for my tastes. Stahn -- --[[User:Stahn|Stahn]] 18:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:07, 12 September 2006

Tool and A Perfect Circle

Per the allmusic guide:

--Boothy443 | comhrÚ 04:12, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)


Is there any consensus on requirements for inclusion in this article, or is based entirely on the editor's opinion? Also, this list is super-incomplete.


Blind Guardian------------

Cu> I think it's necessary to add Blind Guardian in this list. Their "Night in the opera" and "Fly" are obviously much more near to progressive then their earlier epic albums.


Coheed and Cambria----

I think they're just strictly prog rock are they not? I'm taking them off the list.


Rush------------

Why would you ever remove one of the intricate bands in the start of it. www.metal-archives.com also says that that's what they are, so I'm adding them back on


Voivod-----

Another important one, even though their sound is more thrash and hardcore.


Iced Earth and In Flames-----

Last time I checked, they were prog metal.


Mudvayne----

Wouldn't Mudvayne be considered progressive metal? Just wondering.


King Diamond----

Definately re-adding him. Yes, he was Black Metal, however, most of his albums are in fact CONCEPT ALBUMS!!!

Metallica and Iron Maiden

I added both. All first Metallica albums are conceptual albums and latest Maiden works are pretty prog for my tastes. Stahn -- --Stahn 18:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]