Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kingshowman: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→15 January 2017: Hard to keep track :)
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
* {{checkip|1=209.140.39.248}}
* {{checkip|1=209.140.39.248}}
* {{checkip|1=63.143.201.7}}
* {{checkip|1=63.143.201.7}}

Yes, it's hard to keep track of how shocking your lack of English literacy is. CHECKUSERS DO NOT CONNECT NAMED ACCOUNTS TO IP ADDRESSES.

Please read [[WP:COMPETENCEISREQUIRED]] and please come back when you've learned to read and communicate in English with passable proficiency.


Are you illiterate? Please read : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CheckUser#CheckUser_and_privacy_policy
Are you illiterate? Please read : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CheckUser#CheckUser_and_privacy_policy

Revision as of 13:31, 15 January 2017

Jasonanaggie

Jasonanaggie (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Please note that a case was originally opened under Kingshowman (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jasonanaggie. Future cases should be placed under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jasonanaggie.

15 January 2017

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

Yes, it's hard to keep track of how shocking your lack of English literacy is. CHECKUSERS DO NOT CONNECT NAMED ACCOUNTS TO IP ADDRESSES.

Please read WP:COMPETENCEISREQUIRED and please come back when you've learned to read and communicate in English with passable proficiency.

Are you illiterate? Please read : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CheckUser#CheckUser_and_privacy_policy

Checkusers do not connect accounts to IP addresses. Thus your entire request is contra policy. I hope you enjoy wasting your time.63.143.196.107 (talk) 13:23, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Those IPs came to my attention in an edit war about Commons file Commons:2017 Trump dossier by Christopher Steele, Ex-MI6 Russia Desk Intelligence Agent.pdf. None of those IP editors ever contributed to the project except for this specific edit war, although they are able to argue vocally citing 1RR and COPYVIO policies. The original uploader of the file, User:Jasonanaggie, misrepresented the license as {{PD-USGov}},[1] then changed it to {{CC-by-2.0}}.[2] Both are unsupported. Later, when contested, IP 63.143.203.101 removed the license tag entirely,[3] and reverted the license dispute tags several times.[4][5][6][7] Soon, IP 24.188.103.14 appeared and continued the revert war with the same rationale and aggressive edit messages.[8][9]

Meanwhile, a parallel war developed about the insertion of this file in Donald Trump Russia dossier, where both IP 63.143.203.101 and 209.140.46.252 intervened to restore the contested file.[10][11][12][13][14] I placed a warning for disruption on User talk:63.143.203.101, which was ignored. Finally, 63.143.203.101 reported me to WP:ANEW for edit-warring, and 209.140.39.119 admitted being the same editor by saying "So sorry that my IP is not stable, your majesty." [15]

To be fair, I am not sure whether the sockmaster is User:Jasonanaggie, and I apologize for accusing them if they are not the culprit. From circumstantial evidence, this could be any other experienced and opinionated editor in the US politics domain. But whoever it is, the disruption and aggressiveness need to stop. — JFG talk 10:57, 15 January 2017 (UTC) — JFG talk 10:57, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Kingshowman as suspected sockmaster, per analog reports including IPs in the same range: 209.140.39.72‬ and 209.140.43.102‬. Adding the lot to this request. — JFG talk 12:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Gasp, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kingshowman/Archive is chock full of addresses in the same ranges, creating attack pages on the same subject and exhibiting the same aggressive behaviour towards fellow editors. The disruptor's identity looks obvious now. I don't know how to move this report to the appropriate master name, please some admin help me out. — JFG talk 12:54, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Gasp, checkusers don't connect IP addresses to named accounts, as a matter of policy, Einstein. You are thus completely wasting your time with all of this. And no, I did not "insult" you by pointing out your obvious lies. If you don't like being called on your dishonesty, please don't make demonstrably false claims.63.143.196.107 (talk) 13:09, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

1. I removed your copyvio tag because you declined to present evidence the document was copyrighted. I explained this to you, but you insisted on lying and saying the file is copyrighted. There is no evidence of this.

2. I asked you to go to the talk page and get consensus for removal, since the file had previously been added and removed twice today prior to your revert.

3. You violated 1rr and 3rr on the article, which I warned you about, and you have no defense for.

4. I already told you the above IP addresses are all me, and I never tried to hide this fact. Thus I don't understand your accusation of sock puppetry. Not only do I own at least 6 devices ( phones, tablets, laptops, and desktops, etc.) but my IP address seems to change on each device every time I log on and off the internet. Editing from unstable ip addresses is not evidence of sock puppetry. I told you the addresses were mine.

5. I have no association with the named account you are accusing, or any named account (I always edit as an IP) and you provide no evidence of a connection with the account you accuse.. Because he uploaded the file, and I didn'tt agree with your deletion request made on spurious, dishonest grounds? This SPI request is childish. 63.143.193.78 (talk) 11:15, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Further, JFG lies as often as he breaths. He lies above in his account of the edit war, in which he says I warred to include the document when it was already included when he arrived, at which time he reverted the addition. I then reverted him since he falsely claimed the document was copyrighted, and asked him to go to the talk page, since the document had been restored multiple times, so consensus appeared to favor inclusion, and its removal required discission, and anyway he was only allowed 1 revert, and was the 1st reverter of Caspring's edit to include the material. .that should have been the end of it, but he chose to violate 1rr. That's where the conflict started. I then saw that he had placed the same lying tag over at commons, and refused to allow him to do so, until he produced proof that the document was copyrighted, no one claims the document is copyrighted. Jfg then proceeded to continue reverting, lying and saying the article wasn't under 1rr (doesn't even matter, since he violated 3rr too), lyimg again and claiming no other wiki pages uses the document (the corresponding German article also uses it), and claiming a policy about burden of proof for which he sent me a link to two empty, none istent pages. I do not think I have ever seen an editor who lies as often as JFG. 63.143.193.78 (talk) 11:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Kingshowman&oldid=760185588"