Talk:Jupiter-C: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:37, 17 September 2006

Question for this site.How long does this type of fuel last,is it harmful if found that it's shelf life is over?(environmently)

---

"Calling a Redstone-based rocket a Jupiter to show that something was getting done for the money paid for the Jupiter project is typical of the changes-of-name that take place in military industries." I'm not so sure about this... it seems a little POV'd, and not really on target for the Jupiter-C rocket article. If there's no response, I'll go ahead and delete.Sjcodysseus 05:16, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction

The date of the maiden flight in the table differs from that in the main article.

RE: The date in the maiden table refers to the first orbital flight, which isn't clearly labeled. Also, the burnout time listed in the table (120 s) refers to the burnout time of the original Redstone without the increased tankage. It's not clear which of the two figures given in the text (155 s and 157 s) is correct, but I can say that 155 seconds is the amount of time the Rocketdyne engine would take to burn all of the fuel at 100% throttle.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus^(talk) 11:37, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Jupiter-C (rocket) → Jupiter-C – Unnecisarry Disambiguation GW_Simulations_{User Page | Talk} 16:27, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Support per nom and other recent rocket articles. David Kernow 01:43, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{move|Jupiter-C}}
 Question for this site.How long does this type of fuel last,is it harmful if found that it's shelf life is over?(environmently)
@@ Line 11: / Line 10: @@
 RE: The date in the maiden table refers to the first orbital flight, which isn't clearly labeled.  Also, the burnout time listed in the table (120 s) refers to the burnout time of the original Redstone without the increased tankage.  It's not clear which of the two figures given in the text (155 s and 157 s) is correct, but I can say that 155 seconds is the amount of time the Rocketdyne engine would take to burn all of the fuel at 100% throttle.
+<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop -->
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the {{{type|proposal}}}. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. ''
+{{{result|The result of the debate was}}} '''PAGE MOVED''' per discussion below. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 11:37, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 ==Requested move==
 [[Jupiter-C (rocket)]] → [[Jupiter-C]] – Unnecisarry Disambiguation <font color="#116655">'''GW_Simulations'''<sub>[[User:GW Simulations|<font color="#000000">User Page</font>]] | [[User talk:GW_Simulations|<font color="#000000">Talk</font>]]</sub></font> 16:27, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
@@ Line 19: / Line 22: @@
 ===Discussion===
 Add any additional comments
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom -->