Talk:Anti-plurality voting: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Thinking further, I suspect this produces the same result as [[Coombs' method]] --[[User:Henrygb|Henrygb]] 15:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC) |
:Thinking further, I suspect this produces the same result as [[Coombs' method]] --[[User:Henrygb|Henrygb]] 15:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
::While it produces different results, sometimes (SEE LATER), this hypothetical [[Anti-plurality voting]] with [[Instant-runoff voting]] is not famous enough to warrant, its own wikipedia article. |
::While it produces different results, sometimes (SEE LATER), this hypothetical [[Anti-plurality voting]] with [[Instant-runoff voting]] is not famous enough to warrant, its own wikipedia article, and thats the point of talk sections, discuss wikipedia related ussues and not just be some sort of forum. |
||
::About this new voting system, leading to different results, if you imagine this situation: |
::About this new voting system, leading to different results, if you imagine this situation: |
||
::40% a>b>c>d |
::40% a>b>c>d |
Revision as of 10:26, 7 February 2017
Combining APV and AV?
Is there a method which combines Anti-plurality voting with Instant-runoff voting? Perhaps "Transferable elimination voting". So in the Tennessee example, the first round would be
- 58% Memphis, 42% Knoxville, 0% Nashville, 0% Chattanooga
Memphis is eliminated so the next round is
- 68% Knoxville, 32% Nashville, 0% Chattanooga
Knoxville is eliminated so the next round is
- 32% Nashville, 68% Chattanooga
Chattanooga is eliminated and so Nashville wins --Henrygb 12:09, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thinking further, I suspect this produces the same result as Coombs' method --Henrygb 15:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- While it produces different results, sometimes (SEE LATER), this hypothetical Anti-plurality voting with Instant-runoff voting is not famous enough to warrant, its own wikipedia article, and thats the point of talk sections, discuss wikipedia related ussues and not just be some sort of forum.
- About this new voting system, leading to different results, if you imagine this situation:
- 40% a>b>c>d
- 31% c>d>a>b
- 29% d>c>b>a
- C wins under Coombs' method, and A wins under anti plularity instand-runoff.177.92.128.26 (talk) 10:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)