Talk:List of open-source codecs: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Added request for iLBC inclusion |
free MPEG4 part 2? |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I think [[iLBC]] is also an open source codec. Going on it's [http://www.ilbcfreeware.org/ page], however, it says it's freeware. There's a licence there (that I'm too lazy too read) and the codec is also defined in RFC 3951. I think it probably belongs to this list. --[[User:Hdante|Hdante]] 17:52, 28 November 2005 (UTC) |
I think [[iLBC]] is also an open source codec. Going on it's [http://www.ilbcfreeware.org/ page], however, it says it's freeware. There's a licence there (that I'm too lazy too read) and the codec is also defined in RFC 3951. I think it probably belongs to this list. --[[User:Hdante|Hdante]] 17:52, 28 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
== free MPEG4 part 2? == |
|||
Could someone add to the ffmpeg list of free codecs an explaination why mpeg4 part 2 is free? |
|||
From what I've read mpeg4 is is exacly the codec that makes you pay through your nose for it. |
|||
Revision as of 15:10, 18 September 2006
iLBC ?
Hello,
I think iLBC is also an open source codec. Going on it's page, however, it says it's freeware. There's a licence there (that I'm too lazy too read) and the codec is also defined in RFC 3951. I think it probably belongs to this list. --Hdante 17:52, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
free MPEG4 part 2?
Could someone add to the ffmpeg list of free codecs an explaination why mpeg4 part 2 is free? From what I've read mpeg4 is is exacly the codec that makes you pay through your nose for it.