Talk:Rhynchelmis orientalis: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think the article could be somewhat improved if it mentioned ''what the heck this is'', as well as its Latin name. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] 10:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC) |
I think the article could be somewhat improved if it mentioned ''what the heck this is'', as well as its Latin name. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] 10:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC) |
||
Well, I have only just started |
Well, I have only just started. Initially, I'd prefer to get at least ''something'' down about each species, to which more can later be added. I have a stack of primary sources about three decimetres high from which to draw data, but as I ahve to run from my computer to the lab every ten minutes or so (on avarage), litte can be done at each session. I am not sure about what you mean with your comment about its Latin name - it is already there, and to my knowledge, there is no common name to this (or, indeed, most of the other) species. [[User:Grijndvar|Grijndvar]] 07:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:26, 20 September 2006
What is it?
I think the article could be somewhat improved if it mentioned what the heck this is, as well as its Latin name. --Dweller 10:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Well, I have only just started. Initially, I'd prefer to get at least something down about each species, to which more can later be added. I have a stack of primary sources about three decimetres high from which to draw data, but as I ahve to run from my computer to the lab every ten minutes or so (on avarage), litte can be done at each session. I am not sure about what you mean with your comment about its Latin name - it is already there, and to my knowledge, there is no common name to this (or, indeed, most of the other) species. Grijndvar 07:24, 20 September 2006 (UTC)