Jump to content

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 September 20: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 22: Line 22:
Our article [[Enigma software group]] was deleted, at the time it was deleted there was new information presented, that was not reviewed or commented on. Thie new information was:
Our article [[Enigma software group]] was deleted, at the time it was deleted there was new information presented, that was not reviewed or commented on. Thie new information was:


1. an edit of the article reducing it to a stub in order to comply with [[WP:NPOV]]
1. an edit of the article reducing it to a stub in order to comply with [[WP:NPOV]] <br>
2. 2 More links to news stories which broght the total number of verifiable links to third party news stories about the company to 6. This should satisfy point 1. of [[WP:CORP]]
2. 2 More links to news stories which broght the total number of verifiable links to third party news stories about the company to 6. This should satisfy point 1. of [[WP:CORP]]



Revision as of 16:54, 20 September 2006

Full reviews may be found in this page history. For a summary, see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Recently concluded (2006 September)

20 September 2006

Enigma software group

Relist Our article Enigma software group was deleted, at the time it was deleted there was new information presented, that was not reviewed or commented on. Thie new information was:

1. an edit of the article reducing it to a stub in order to comply with WP:NPOV
2. 2 More links to news stories which broght the total number of verifiable links to third party news stories about the company to 6. This should satisfy point 1. of WP:CORP

http://www.smartcomputing.com/editorial/article.asp?article=articles/2005/s1603/10s03/10s03.asp http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:JIhEsENj3cgJ:redherring.com/Article.aspx%3Fa%3D11282%26hed%3DIE7%2Bdue%2Bthis%2Bsummer+redherring+%22enigma+software%22&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=6 the last link is in google cache. You need to login to Red Herring's website read it directly.

Some of the editors had complained the article was not written from a neutral point of view WP:NPOV. I rewrote the article as a stub which should comply with that policy as well.

(DISCLOSURE: the wikipedian who is asking to relist does has a vested interest in the article) Enigmasoftwaregroup 16:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!