Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ShinySquire: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
I'm the same person with multiple accounts, most of my accounts are throwaway accounts. I |
I'm the same person with multiple accounts, with most of my accounts are throwaway accounts. I use multiple accounts to hide my IP from public view, due to editing on a contentious subject, and it was never my intention to be deceptive. From my understanding of the policy on multiple accounts, my actions are perfectly allowed. |
||
If I somehow violated a rule on it, it was never my intention. Reading my edits to the Wiki, you can see that all of my edits have been constructive and with the purpose of improving the articles within. I never have any malicious intent, and followed Wikipedia guidelines on sock puppets and multiple accounts; all of my edits are constructive. On the other note, before today, I didn't know how to respond to accusations, so I'll freely admit that is my fault. |
|||
Line 31: | Line 33: | ||
[[User:AnonEditor18923|AnonEditor18923]] ([[User talk:AnonEditor18923|talk]]) 03:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC) |
[[User:AnonEditor18923|AnonEditor18923]] ([[User talk:AnonEditor18923|talk]]) 03:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 03:42, 14 April 2017
ShinySquire
- ShinySquire (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: confirmed
14 April 2017
Suspected sockpuppets
- AnonEditor18923 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- RonaldWilliam (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- ProudCalifornian (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Heavy focus on Brittany Pettibone, mixed in with gnomish wikilinks, just like previous socks. Grayfell (talk) 03:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
AnonEditor18923 is open about being an alt of RonaldWilliam [1] Grayfell (talk) 03:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I'm the same person with multiple accounts, with most of my accounts are throwaway accounts. I use multiple accounts to hide my IP from public view, due to editing on a contentious subject, and it was never my intention to be deceptive. From my understanding of the policy on multiple accounts, my actions are perfectly allowed.
If I somehow violated a rule on it, it was never my intention. Reading my edits to the Wiki, you can see that all of my edits have been constructive and with the purpose of improving the articles within. I never have any malicious intent, and followed Wikipedia guidelines on sock puppets and multiple accounts; all of my edits are constructive. On the other note, before today, I didn't know how to respond to accusations, so I'll freely admit that is my fault.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Legitimate_uses
AnonEditor18923 (talk) 03:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)